this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37706 readers
6 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spoony 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I barely trust the average consumer to be able to drive, I can't imagine people being able to fly whenever. Also- who actually needs this and why?

[–] smellythief 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

who actually needs this and why?

Anyone who wants to avoid traffic. Or get somewhere without road access. It would be great if this world could be less covered in asphalt.

[–] Butterbee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The lengths people will go to to avoid making public transit work.

[–] smellythief 2 points 1 year ago

Not sure i get your point. Public transit would also be better with less traffic and maybe stops located in ground-inaccessible places. In other words, flying public transit could also work.

[–] millie 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, if this were actually real and were somehow practical, it could potentially save Massachusetts alone billions per year in road repair costs.

[–] Domiku 4 points 1 year ago

You still can’t have people flying over houses, etc. considering the number of traffic accidents and breakdowns, any failure in the air would lead to catastrophe on the ground below it.