this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22309 readers
4 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bozicus@lemmy.one 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It looks like the actual research suggests that you can have the amount of aspartame in 12-36 cans of diet soda before you increase your cancer risk, so even if you stay on the conservative side of that, and say "no more than 12 cans," I think most people don't have to change their aspartame intake in response to this. You should definitely talk to your doctor about it if you already have a high cancer risk, or really like diet soda, or just want more reliable information than you can get online.

I think the more useful takeaway from this article is that beverage companies are trying to keep aspartame from being declared a possible carcinogen. That's hardly surprising, but it seems more verifiably true than the proposition that aspartame is a significant carcinogen. A lot of things can increase cancer risk slightly, but much fewer increase cancer risk enough to worry about them.

[–] nlm 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

12-36 cans per what? Week, month, year, lifetime? :)

[–] Nechesh 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you’re drinking 36 cans of soda per day, you’ve got bigger problems than aspartame.

[–] Nechesh 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ya I've known people that might drink 6-8 diet cokes in a day, but even exceeding 12 seems unlikely.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

So, 11 is the limit.

[–] nlm 1 points 2 years ago

Missed that, but.. yeah, that ought to be easy to remain under.