this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10316 readers
9 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The KGB was dissolved in 1991 with the rest of the Russian SFSR. I know what you are getting at but stuff like this feels ahistorical
The KGB was very much around in 1987 when Trump visited Moscow and began pushing Russian interests in America and generally criticizing US alliances.
The article speaks of the KGB as if it is still relevant to modern geopolitics. It genuinely does not matter if Trump had a homoerotic relationship with numurous KGB assets. Its been 34 years. Envoking its name feels more like a cheap way to get clicks from boomers haven't realized the cold war ended. Trump has significantly more relevant connections to Russia than this.
"KGB" still evokes the idea of Soviet/Russian agents in three convenient letters. Honestly, at this point, I'd be depressed to see a poll of how many people in the U.S. know the USSR is no more. We referred to them as "Russians" in the '80s anyway. Details are unimportant to voters.