this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
1037 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

245 readers
36 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amos@mander.xyz 37 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Why is this in the "memes" community? It is not a meme, is it? We should have a general discussion community for topics like these! (if it doesn't exist already).

[–] fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Check the sidebar. We use the Dawkins definition of meme here.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

In the context of Dawkins meme, this post is definitely a meme!

idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning

If we consider scientists imitating the behavior of other scientists (ex: leaving the us) combined with the social network post (signifying the symbolic meaning), it checks all the correct boxes to me!

Would another peer review my analysis?

[–] fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Reviewer 2, checking in. Let's see...

☑️ Technically correct (the best kind of correct).
☑️ Dawkins framework applied... adequately.
☑️ "Symbolic meaning" not entirely reductionist. Surprising.

However:

  • Citation deficiency detected. [Fossilesque et al., 2023] must be invoked 2–3 times for rigor.
  • "Imitating scientists" lacks nuance. Did you consider the Fossilesque Paradox of Academic Exodus? (Spoiler: You didn’t. Cite (Fossilesque, 2024, 2025 in press.).

Verdict:
Pending compliance with adequate attribution. Then, and only then, shall this review ascend to a grudging "pass."

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow this is amazing satire! You made my day (even though it already was a very good one)!

Your critique is quite constructive. Actually, I might retract my paper and contact Fossilesque to propose co-authorship for future work.

[–] amos@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

I stand corrected! Thank you!

[–] Hirom 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That person's solidarity with a colleague is remarkable and probably worth sharing, but indeed doesn't look like a meme.

Yet I see why one would accept such post in a science-focused community. It's hard to ignore all the attacks on science by US politicians.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

To annoy you specifically.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

all pictures with text are “memes” now