this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10304 readers
29 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This could be the end of much of the fediverse, especially the more left-leaning parts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Megaman_EXE 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Which brings us back to the core question: how could these Democratic Senators support a plan that would simultaneously give Donald Trump unprecedented censorship powers while also consolidating Meta’s control over online speech?

The evidence suggests they simply don’t understand what they’re doing. Each of these Senators has a documented history of fundamental confusion about Section 230 and how the internet works:

Richard Blumenthal has been getting Section 230 wrong since his days as Connecticut’s AG in the early 2000s.

Sheldon Whitehouse’s chapter on free speech revealed such profound confusion about Section 230 that it’s hard to believe he’s actually read the law.

We’ve already covered Durbin and Klobuchar’s dangerous misunderstandings.

I'm sure glad they're the representatives standing up for democracy haha right guys?