this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
38168 readers
26 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That RAM is nice, but core count doesn't say much at this point: there are different cores with different architectures, multithreading, pipelining, caches, speeds, etc.
I'd rather see a TOPS comparison:
Meta is claiming to have 350,000 H100s, to put things into perspective.
I mean, sure, but largely GPU-based TOPS isn't that good a comparison with a CPU+GPU mixture. Most tasks can't be parallelized that well, so comparing TOPS between an APU and a TPU/GPU is not apples to apples (heh).
Agreed, but my point is that stating "x-core CPU, y-core GPU, z-core NPU", is basically non-information.
I'd like to see the TOPS for each of those, instead of a "core count" that tells me nothing about actual performance. Even the TOPS are orientative... but would be a good start.