this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
115 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38114 readers
80 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Understandable choice, given that Skype is pretty much redundant with Teams. Back in 2004-2005 Skype was really hyped because of free voice calls through the Internet, but few days later several other messaging apps incorporated that feature; Skype's thunder was stolen. Also its inconsistent branding was a problem: there was Skype for Business that later became Lync, ultimately becoming Teams. Skype kind of became forgotten and obsolete.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Powderhorn 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ByteSorcerer 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It was successfull for a while up to 10 years or so ago, when it was the main free option for video calling. But nowadays there are plenty of alternatives, pretty much all of which do a better job than Skype ever did.

Skype has now been pretty much obsolete for years so I don't think it's too bad that it's ending.

The Google approach would have been to already have killed it in 2004 before it ever even had a chance to be successful.

[–] Powderhorn 2 points 7 hours ago

MS would have had no chance to kill it before buying it. Now, if Meta could just start killing products, the world would be a better place.