this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
147 points (100.0% liked)

PieFed Meta

3 readers
1 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Check out #GlobalSwitchDay on Mastodon - https://mastodon.social/tags/GlobalSwitchDay

... and consider boosting this post - https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@rimu/113926058602986146

https://piefed.social

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Seems like an asshole/ego move to fork Lemmy rather than contribute to it when Lemmy is an ongoing project

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Ignoring the fact piefed isn’t a lemmy fork.

Are you really going to argue that forking an existing project because you want to take it a different way is an asshole move?

[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also ignoring the same fact.

I mean in a way they're not wrong. This open source fragmentation is an actual nightmare at this point...

Buuuuut considering who the lemmy devs are I will gladly move to Piefed when I can actually easily host my own instance.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Open source is all about fragmentation. It's a natural result of freedom.

Sure, if everybody pulled the same direction on the same project and successfully coordinated their cooperative effort while agreeing on everything and also having the perfect™ vision for the project, that would be great.

But that's just not gonna happen, for a million reasons. So instead, we get diversity, and people can use the software that fits them, and develop what they're interested in in the language of their choosing. Thank god.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And why it we'll never ever be mainstream.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Open source?!

Open source software is everywhere. Even freaking chromium is open source. Android is open source. WebKit is open source. Pretty much the entire web runs on Linux servers. Even gamers buy devices running Linux now.

Is it not mainstream because people don't realize it's open source while using it? Isn't it rather that it is mainstream when people use it without even realizing?

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Fork no but it literally says a lemmy clone on its GitHub page. Also doesn't seem very active.

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Diversity is good

[–] astro_ray@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago

Why did you assume it's a lemmy fork?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anything to avoid those dirty commie tankies. Lol

[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm fine with it whilst there are maintainers with the whole "transgenderism is bourgeoise decadence" stance going on. I've happily worked with MLs and MLMs, I'm not a fan of bigots who work backwards to fit their ideology to their prejudices.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

MLs = Marxist Leninists

MLMs = Multi Level Marketing (schemes)?

[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Aaaaah. Yeah that makes more sense.

Only if its still compatible, otherwise no. Not "anything"

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

It's an entirely different codebase. Lemmy is written in Rust, PieFed in Python. If you're a Python developer you're not going to randomly learn Rust to contribute to the huge existing codebase that is Lemmy, and even if you did you might have a different stance than the Lemmy developers calling for a fork.

Furthermore, it's not a zero sum game. The projects share content, and both benefit from the success of the other.