this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
131 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37849 readers
58 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sina 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Now give me half that performance for $150, without enforcing that whatever it's called bar thing! (neither of these two things will happen)

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All modern motherboards support ReBAR. Not sure why you'd be against it.

[–] DdCno1 34 points 1 month ago

Probably because they want to use this card with an old board, which means an older CPU, which makes no sense with a card this powerful, since it'll drastically bottleneck GPU performance. It's a common mistake people are making though.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 19 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

That's unreasonable mate. Rebar is good and compute has always been cheaper if you stack more of it, to a point.

A compatible mono is dirt cheap anyway. Stop wasting electricity by running very legacy systems.