this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024

65 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10177 readers

21 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gov. Shapiro calls Musk's $1M offer to Pennsylvania voters 'deeply concerning' (www.npr.org)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/politics

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Musk announced the $1 million giveaway at an event in Harrisburg, Pa., on Saturday. The event was part of a tour supporting Trump.

“I have a surprise for you," Musk said shortly before bringing out a giant check. "We are going to be awarding $1 million to people who have signed the petition — every day, from now until the election.”

"If you look at the conditions, you must be a registered voter," Hasen said. "And so this is essentially a lottery that's open only to people who register to vote. So it’s either an incentive for someone to vote or it’s a reward. And either way, it violates federal law."

He calls Musk's actions "clearly illegal" because it violates statute 52 U.S.C. 10307(c) and the Department of Justice’s election manual.

Hasen said willful violation of statute 52 U.S.C. 10307(c) comes with a $10,000 fine and up to five years in prison.

"I don't think it would be likely that he would suffer such a serious fine," Hasen said of Musk. "Although, if he was warned that this is illegal activity and continued to do it, I think that would create a different kind of situation."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Midnitte 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hasen said willful violation of statute 52 U.S.C. 10307(c) comes with a $10,000 fine and up to five years in prison.

Please, stop, I cant only get so erect.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"I don't think it would be likely that he would suffer such a serious fine," Hasen said of Musk. "Although, if he was warned that this is illegal activity and continued to do it, I think that would create a different kind of situation."

[–] Arkham 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Musk: violates a federal law by giving away a cool million every day until election day

Feds: "let's fine that guy $10,000, that seems like a pretty serious amount for a fine"

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

If the consequence of violating a law is a fine, that law is essentially optional for the rich; if the consequences of violating a law is prison time, but the penalties can be avoided through (expensive) legal protection, those laws are also optional for the rich. The rich are hard to prosecute under the law, so it's not surprising when the law is primarily enforced on the rest of us (esp. on the most vulnerable of us).

An easy example: the IRS audits the poor much more than the wealthy, partially because their attempts to target the wealthy was met with legal difficulties.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So...he's been officially warned to stop, right?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 month ago

Take a guess 🤡

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

Looks like the DOJ did send a letter:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/elon-musk-doj-letter-paying-people-to-vote-is-a-crime

In a letter sent days after he announced the sweepstakes, Robert Heberle, the head of the DOJ’s election crimes branch, told Musk that offering anything of monetary value to influence voters violates federal law. ... The letter reportedly “did not specify any immediate legal action” but “did spell out the penalties for breaking US voting laws, including possible imprisonment of up to five years.”

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that would create a different kind of situation.

No prosecutor will touch this... Yall are fucking naive. Jfc how much mote info do you need.

Musk is one of the OG oligarchs, he do anything he wants and we will pay him more for it.

Grow the fuck up and see the world for what it is.

[–] Gaywallet 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're welcome to disagree (I also don't think Musk will be prosecuted for this), but you're not treating others with good faith when you tell them to grow the fuck up and see the world for what it is - that's an insult between the lines here. This is your reminder to be(e) nice on our instance.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These "rules" only seem to be an issue on "politics" subs...

Hmmm...

I calling on people to level up their understanding of the regime is "not nice"

Also, this was deff good faith position lol

[–] Gaywallet 17 points 1 month ago

These issues happen in other communities as well, violations just seem to happen more often in politics than anywhere else, probably because of the charged nature of politics and the increasingly polarized environment.

I wasn't reflecting upon the faith of the position. What was bad faith was your assumption that the other person was ignorant of the way the world works. There are countless other possible explanations for this person was merely quoting the article as a response to someone being excited that Musk might get prosecuted for doing something that arguably should be illegal and he should be punished for. It's also not a good look that you're going around replying to people with a short response which includes a clown emoji that adds nothing to a conversation or the fact that you're immediately questioning a moderator rather than reflecting upon your behavior and approaching the suggestion from a place of good faith. I wouldn't be stepping in and having a conversation with you if I didn't think this kind of behavior was harmful for the community in some fashion. Keep in mind, I didn't remove your content or ban you, I simply started a conversation because I want this community and our instance to continue to be a nice place.