this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2244 readers
1 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
From reading the NPR article, it doesn’t sound like the surgical team started the procedure. They aborted before making any incisions, which is what they should have done. The Guardian headline is a touch sensationalist.
What’s horrifying is how they got all the way to the operating room before recognizing that the patient wasn’t brain dead.
From my understanding, they won't start the procedure until the person is declared dead and the heart stops. It may seem morbid that they're waiting for someone to die, but they're not going to start hacking someone who still has a heartbeat much less is awake. They didn't "stop" the procedure because he was showing signs of life, they didn't start the procedure because he wasn't showing signs of death.