this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
353 points (100.0% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

160 readers
9 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More dataisdepressing than dataisbeautiful

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I sometimes think they turn conservative because women won't date them.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure women don't want to date people who have any sort of disposition that leans towards hating them or believing that women are lesser than men.

Unfortunately, a lot of men learned that way of thinking early in life(from family and/or media) and it ruins any attempt at a relationship, then they blame women and run to the very people who set them up to fail for validation, or find new ones like that sex trafficker with the pizza boxes, or that canadian psychologist who sugar coats sexism online. Repeat ad nauseum.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I have an old high school friend who is very much into the whole Andrew Tate thing. His parents were separated, I don't know the details as to why, but I do know that his father was a lot more stable than his mother, and I do sometimes wonder if he had lived with his father, if he would have turned out better.

He also thinks the earth is flat because... otherwise a ball would roll off a table. QED.

So not exactly firing an all cylinders to begin with.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

“Divorced dad energy” is one of those meme things that everyone likes to make fun of when a dude does anything, but no one likes to address that same poison when divorced moms act like fools.

My mother would drag me to various groups that would absolutely shit on “men” constantly, and I got to hear that constantly. It was weird growing up in that environment, but luckily for me it was before the redpill trash all over the internet. Managed to find some good friends in high school

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

That's a interesting point. My mother was substantially more mentally stable when I was a child then when my siblings were born.

[–] krnl386@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was the mainstream 70-80 years ago. Late 90’s and early 2000’s largely (not completely; nothing is perfect) corrected that, although there was still work to be done. For a brief couple of decades, society enjoyed unadulterated equality underpinned by meritocracy.

Nowadays men are checking out because modern society overcorrected to the point of them feeling rejected and hated… and unfortunately shithead lowlives like Tate capitalize on that. There are also academics like Peterson whose messaging is too nuanced for the average liberal to comprehend without bias (that’s legitimately difficult to do especially when one’s doctrine actively teaches and encourages ignorance and rejection of opposing views) - kind of like the reverse Tate fanboy, i.e. flaming liberal commie/socialist that would rather dump oil on priceless paintings in museums and run around naked while screaming in people faces while blocking major arterial streets in a busy city in the name of climate change or veganism or some other shit. So on one hand you have Tate fanboys (borderline classical Nazis) and on the other extreme of the spectrum you have overgrown narcissists (basically grown-ass adult toddlers that never developed a proper superego, to use Freudian parlance). I wouldn’t expect an adult toddler with deep-rooted indoctrinated biases to be able to consume or critically analyze any kind of nuanced opinion that did not 100% align with their own… heck, one SJW blue haired leftie with a law degree told me that Peterson’s original argument was that he did not accept trans people, and were genuinely surprised to learn that his sticking point was about compelled speech (weaponized anti-misgendering legislation), rather than being or nor being transgender.

So from the “incel” perspective (and I am usijg that term rather cynically here, as today’s “incel” is basically the 90’s average 20-30 year old man with classical liberal leanings) on one hand, you have people screaming at you how you’re the problem, you’re a nazi, an incel, blah blah blah, and on the other hand you have people who remind you of the “good old days” when you could settle down, buy a home with a picket fence, a car, a dog/cat, a couple of kids and live your damn life in peace… with a bit of 40-60’s sexism/nazi-ism (depending on who you listen to) sprinkled in. Now whom are you going to listen to as a cis white straight male (the majority of males, BTW)? Hmmm… I wonder…

[–] GammaGames 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

academics like peterson

LMFAO

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn’t he recently lose his license to practice because he was saying bullshit that no real psychiatrist would agree with?

[–] GammaGames 3 points 1 month ago

Not yet! He has to go to training first

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Didn’t he recently lose his license to practice because he was saying bullshit that no real psychiatrist would agree with?

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the age of social media I imagine people are actually a lot more antisocial than we used to be…. And if young men and young women are all online more now and actually go out to interact in person less than we used to, this would make it a lot more difficult for young men to interact with the young women long enough to ask them out….

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Online is heavily skewed in women's favor unfortunately. I had a female coworker that had 100+ matches on bumble and kept complaining how hard it was too keep track of. She wasn't even very pretty and she had an empty pot for head. Meanwhile male coworkers really struggle. No surprise This will make some males bitter and lash out. Even if they do find a partner Worst part is if the social skills are bad it is a bad relationship. I hope we are not seeing a universe 25 style collapse.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I can’t remember which app it was, but I tried online dating over a decade ago. I noticed I wasn’t getting very many responses to any messages I sent out, and it was basically after saying yes to everyone and I had spent some time on the app, so I got to the point where I just messaged everyone a generic opener….

I talked to my female roommate at the time and I got a couple generic photos of her, she was a young mid 20’s woman who was very pretty but idk average for a young beautiful woman.

I created a new profile for myself, and also a second profile for her, I let her choose the most attractive photos of me and I chose some dorky not very attractive but still cute I guess photos of her….

She had ten messages before we were even able to upload the first photo after just creating the account.

This doesn’t mean that she got messages from guys who were someone she would consider dating. It just means she got a lot of messages. I think guys don’t realize how many messages the women get. They have to wade through hundreds of “hi how are you doing” messages before they can even start a conversation. Whereas the guys have to send out messages that are unique and capture the attention of ladies to get a conversation started. Neither is ideal, it’s just how it is

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's very true and likely why she felt so overwhelmed. No one is really winning. She would have had a really good match in there but drowned in a sea of options.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In this case we only left the app open for a couple hours that afternoon before we deleted it, but it’s just anecdotal evidence that show if we are specifically talking about online dating the problems are just as bad for either sex if we are talking about cis heteronormative relationships

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A really sad point. Though I think drowning in option is better for self esteem than 0. If males had plenty I doubt we would see such a trend.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Drowning in strawberries when you are allergic to strawberries is not very good for your health

[–] daltotron@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dunno if that would be being allergic to strawberries so much, since most of these services have options for only seeing women if you're also a women. The gay dating market in general seems much healthier, ime. It's more as though you were drowning in strawberries, and then maybe one out of a twenty or twenty-five wasn't rotten at the face, or, maybe one in twenty wasn't a clone of the same five or six kinds of strawberries that you keep seeing. It's ultimately the same problem for both sexes, though. An overabundance, and a lack of real ability to distinguish between everything because of both a glut and a drought of overly flattened data leads to a kind of processed apathy out of sheer volume. Then, neglect leads to desperation, and then for some, to resentment, and so on and so forth. What I really don't understand is that for mostly purely cultural reasons there's such a massive and self-reinforcing disparity, it's kind of insane. There has to be a further underlying cause there than just like, 20 or 25% of men are desperate freaks and that sort of plunges everything into a downward spiral where everyone is sort of putting on this elaborate game of lying to each other because of a couple bad actors. Makes it kind of impossible to deal with any of this if you're autistic, to be honest.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Online dating is probably a bad idea. I’m pretty sure the number one criteria is looks, because that’s all you really have to go on for the most part.

If you care about more than just looks, meeting people in person is going to be the way to go.

I guess if you are an introvert you might struggle in person, but the connections you do make will be that much more valuable.

A lot of connections online are superficial and if you can delete your whole relationship with someone with one click of a button, you probably didn’t have any kind of authentic relationship in the first place.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wasn’t specifically talking about online dating, but women are generally more desired by men than vice versa, whether online or in person.

I can’t imagine online dating to be useful than for more than a handful of people in my opinion.

I was more saying since we are all online more, we are all interacting in person a lot less, which allows for more organic interactions…

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah I agree. Wanting to Go back the good old days is what is causing this trend. Though Realistically all the social skills in the world won't bag you the girl if you are average right now. I knew a few coworkers that wouldn't even talk to a guy unless he was a 666 man. 6 figures, 6 feet, 6 pack. No surprise they are single. I wonder if their POV changed overtime, they were in early 20s at the time. I know my old roommate lowered her standards super hard over 30 to bag a husband.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anecdotal evidence is not the same as actual data across populations

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Sample size is rather small from personal experience. I am curious if such data exists.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t think I understand what you are saying. Data does exist.

Taller men are generally seen as more attractive.

Wealthier people, or people who pay attention to the latest trends in general are seen as more attractive.

Healthy and fit people are generally seen as more attractive.

All of this is true, but so what. If someone is hyper focused on getting a man or woman to be with them who has these or other specific physical and / or socioeconomic traits, isn’t that for them to decide?

If you only want to date women who have been on the covered of the sports illustrated swimsuit edition, isn’t that your choice also?

What’s your point?

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We sort of drifted from orignal topic. Typical for me lol. I guess the point is as human society shifts more online those that don't have any of the features you mentioned in the previous post are hit the hardest in finding a mate. Also in turn lack of focus in social skills will make any relationship less successful. This sudden shift is likely a factor for the reactionary trend. History in 30 years is going to be "fun" unfortunately.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Those who don’t have the traits should avoid online dating.

That’s all that means. Meet and interact in person with real people.

If you can’t meet and interact in person with real people then yes, you will struggle to find a partner.

We are spending time on social media, but we aren’t really being social. That’s my point.

If you’re going to hyperfixate on the fact that you don’t have a six pack and are not tall then that is a you issue, not anyone else’s problem.

[–] krnl386@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Well, that and also because the left basically hates them. Hearing narratives like “men are privileged, racist, homophobic, and all the other isms, phobes and ists” combined with DEI initiatives that invalidate and sabotage their hard work and achievements makes them want to disconnect from these groups and modern societal “norms.”

Why would you date someone who resents and hates you?