this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
31 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wander@yiffit.net 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Meanwhile tidal already has better quality at the same price.

[–] TheFrenchGhosty@lemmy.pussthecat.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MQA is literal garbage, so no, Tidal doesn't.

Qobuz and Deezer do however.

[–] Wander@yiffit.net 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

It's been a long time since the MQA controversy but I remember this was a great video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRjsu9-Vznc

IIRC Tidal basically applies subjective post-processing onto the lossless files and pretends they sound better.

[–] TheFrenchGhosty@lemmy.pussthecat.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Snake oil at best.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and integrates with Plex, so I can self host my own high quality library and truly use tidal as an exploring platform

[–] SidewaysHighways 1 points 1 year ago

Really!? That's interesting.

That's been my whole hangup so far is finding an easy, unified way to play my files either from devices at home or from the phone while I'm on the go, and still have Playlists and metrics all associated.

But I hate plex though

load more comments (1 replies)