this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
603 points (100.0% liked)

196

667 readers
60 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 24 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Recently I've started to think that these and other similar battles are lost.

[–] DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They aren't "lost", because they were never yours to be "fighting" in the first place..

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

I’m a grammar loving curmudgeon. Even I check myself more often than not after I realized the kind of classist tones that come through when arguing against lexicon.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

This one isn't even real. "Fewer" can only refer to countable things, but "less" can refer to both countable and uncountable things, and has been used that way for hundreds of years. It has never been wrong to say "less."

[–] kspatlas@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Language prescriptivism is a useless endeavour, let the language evolve as it wants, I personally don't mind the use of less in this situation