this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
221 points (100.0% liked)

196

663 readers
28 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a fan of utalitarianism myelf, so this might be wrong; this sounds like utalitarianism - as the action you did cause other suffering.

then in your moral philosophy, are all actions that cause suffering (and joy, and all other feelings a human can experience) morally wrong?

Is then not dating, f.ex Morally wrong?

Or is it the impossibility of consent? Yes, a child is unable to consent to being born. Just as we are all unable to consent to the world being created, or nature's whims. I cannot consent to a state on the other side of the world making policies, but I can still react and do things about it.

Is it morally wrong to let animals have children?

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] pixelbound 2 points 7 months ago

It's the norwegian / danish way of writing e.g

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago
[–] Katrisia@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

There's also antinatalism from a deontological perspective.

But, from the negative utilitarianists I've known and seen, I've found an intense debate about the animal reproduction question. Some say antinatalism should include non-human animals and any other sentient being; some say it's a human-only matter. I do not have an opinion.