this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
254 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

421 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
254
Coomitter be like (lemm.ee)
submitted 4 months ago by sag@lemm.ee to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can always adapt to your how repo. But yeah, that's the point. If you can trust people to make changes on a repo then you should be able to trust them in using some kind of commit structure.

Generic names are probably used in order to crate a familiar, easy to remember, structurized commit format.

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

The generic name I'm complaining about is "conventional commits", not "fix" and "feat"