this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
97 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
68 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just a simple question : Which file system do you recommend for Linux? Ext4...?

EDIT : Thanks to everyone who commented, I think I will try btrfs on my root partition and keep ext4 for my home directory 😃

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

BTRFS is not more performant than EXT4.

I personally dont use any features of BTRFS manually though, as Fedora Kinoite does that for me.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

2008 is not "damn old" in terms of filesystems.

[–] jcarax 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is 16 years ago, that's pretty old in terms of technology.

It's also an evolution of ex3 and ext2, and ext if you want to consider it's very short lifetime. In fact, the lead developer stated in 2008 that it was meant as a stop gap, as it's based on old technology with some new features, and that BTRFS was the future.

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And yet here we are 16 years later with btrfs only just in a position to be usable (perhaps. My experience is that I'll never use it again)

[–] jcarax 2 points 6 months ago

And EXT had been developed for 16 years at that point (and XFS for 15). They didn't mature overnight, either.

Hopefully bcachefs matures more quickly, because we need a mainline replacement for ZFS.

[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Note that ext4 is damn old

Hmm ? Linux kernel is way older than ext4. And before ext4 there was ext3 and ext2. Linux users also have the choice of using XFS file system and for IT persons working for corporations XFS can have some advantages. Let's see, XFS was born in 1993.

more modern ones like btrfs or bcachefs

Years ago I thought that bcachecfs looked interesting but last thing I read about it this year was not very promising regarding reliability. Not sure whether it was in comments on Lemmy but here I found something from Linus himself : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcachefs#Stability

[–] jcarax 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah, bcachefs is still very very young, and not ready for much of anything beyond tinkering. But I'm definitely excited to have a native filesystem that's designed with tiers in mind.