this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
176 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

423 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

You shouldn’t have ever been recommending dart or flutter.

Why not?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I would argue so, because Google has quite a reputation for killing projects: https://killedbygoogle.com

Especially with a programming language or framework, you don't want to invest in it, only to find out that it's going on the chopping block.

[–] xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Even if Google laid off staff for the Flutter and Dart team, I don't think those two will be going anywhere any time soon. Mostly because a huge majority Android ecosystem is based on them, still a stupid decisions of them.

I hope this doesn't age like milk.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'm mostly just biased because I do native mobile development but flutter has always seemed like a false economy to me. You're trying to build cross platform but it'll take more than 2x as long as building each platform to get the same quality of experience. So either you have a shittier experience or you take even longer than true native dev.

But I'm obviously very biased here.

load more comments (3 replies)