this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
48 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
42
So now what distro are we running for LTS desktops? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/linux@lemmy.ml
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Ubuntu has too many problems for me to want to run it. However, it has occurred to me that there aren't a lot of distros that are like the Ubuntu LTS.

Basic requirements for a LTS:

  • at least 2 years of support
  • semi recent versions of applications like Chrome and Firefox (might consider flatpak)
  • a stable experience that isn't buggy
  • fast security updates

Distros considered:

  • Debian (stable)
  • Rocky Linux
  • openSUSE
  • Cent OS stream
  • Fedora

As far as I can tell none of the options listed are quite suitable. They are either to unstable or way to out of date. I like Rocky Linux but it doesn't seem to be desktop focused as far as I can tell. I would use Debian but Debian doesn't have the greatest security defaults. (No selinux profiles out of the box)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mactan@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

what is the actual use case of LTS on regular desktop non-workstation anyway?

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is the system working after the install? If yes, it'll work for years until the next version and you don't need to worry about it. With rolling release every update can mess up your system.

[–] mactan@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's software, every update can mess up your system. your only guaranteed good media is the install ISO, after that it's only as good as the packager, even for LTS

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you're going to be pedantic, not even an ISO is guaranteed to work perfectly. The point is that a security patch is far less likely to cause issues than some random release. And that's even before going into broken releases like GRUB on arch.

[–] mactan@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

LTS ISO aren't guaranteed to work? isn't that the point, install once and run forever?

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

That's why I started my first comment with:

Is the system working after the install?

Linux devs aren't magic men who can test an absurd number of hardware combinations. Also, they depend on package maintainers to release a non-security fix before they start freezing packages and testing them.

The point is that if there's an issue, it's well researched and you can usually easily find a solution as people have been having that same issue for the last few years.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Low maintenance and repeatability

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago

what is a regular desktop non-workstation??