this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
238 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13031 readers
2 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
238
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by NiklzNDimz to c/science
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhatInferno@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dont worry im sure the govt will give them tons of subsidies to stay open/make sure thier profits dont go too far down

[–] alyaza 10 points 1 year ago

Dont worry im sure the govt will give them tons of subsidies to stay open/make sure thier profits dont go too far down

Trump tried and this did nothing. the US government's policy at this point also could not be more antithetical to the continuation of coal as a power source. the Biden administration is trying to propose a rule ("slash their greenhouse gas pollution 90 percent between 2035 and 2040 — or shut down") that would functionally kill coal and, as of now, probably the ability of even natural gas to operate. (i'm not aware of any technology which can get natural gas to such a non-polluting point, much less coal which produces nearly twice as many emissions.) coal is in extremely terminal decline in the US: the EIA says "nearly a quarter of the operating U.S. coal-fired fleet scheduled to retire by 2029" and that's probably an underestimate. half of existing coal capacity in 2011 is likely to be gone by 2026. i know we like to be cynical about these things collectively, but all available evidence clearly indicates this is not a correct perspective to hold.

[–] ass_troll 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate that you're probably right