this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

Meta (lemm.ee)

36 readers
1 users here now

lemm.ee Meta

This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.

News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!


Rules:


If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K

Discord is only a back-up channel, !meta@lemm.ee will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.


If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I noticed that Lemmy has the reddit system with upvotes and down votes, but I didn't found anything about the general ratio of up/down a user have, am I missing something or it is intended?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] elkinpass@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think they were refering to "karma whoring". It has nothing to do with social regulation, just the fact that there's a bunch of people (and bots!) that will do anything for fake internet points. It's just insincere at the end of the day.

[โ€“] Spzi@lemmy.click 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, I think you are right. I did not distinguish properly between karma within a thread, and karma across threads, on an account level.

Within threads (which is what we have here) karma can function as a social regulator. Across threads (which we don't have) it depends on too many other factors like community size to have that effect.

I agree the latter encourages "karma whoring" without being able to sort good from bad anymore. So at the end of the day, I find the current system is a quite sensible compromise.