this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
416 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
67 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/17617609

They supposedly can be disabled in settings- but we all know that won't last. They're going full Microsoft Skype mode and it's only a matter of time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vodulas 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Does IRC do voice nowadays? I think that is the main reason people use Discord

[–] rinze@infosec.pub 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

If you mean that in some channels only some people can actually "talk", I think it depends on the configuration of the channel, but it's a possibility.

I thought people used Discord because you could have video / audio chats (not sure about this, I've used it very sparsely.)

And then there are Open Source projects that use Discord as the documentation repository. Hell is a place on the Internet, apparently.

[–] jarfil 38 points 7 months ago

Discord became popular because it's a more convenient integration of audio chat for gaming, with text chat: no need to set up a server (like TeamSpeak or Mumble).

People using Discord for official documentation, or bug reporting, are in a circle of hell just slightly below the ones doing the same on Reddit. Community support... they may get a pass.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] rinze@infosec.pub 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You're right, I completely misinterpreted the comment. The thing is that "voice" is a very specific term within IRC, and I got confused :D

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 7 months ago

Yup, I realized that :) I do believe discord has just about all the features IRC can offer. And then some, of course. But that isn't saying much, considering IRC is one of the earliest uses of the internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vodulas 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I mean audio chats (voice is short for voice chat). I think the video calls are not used as much, but are still a good feature. I'll probably try Revolt (someone linked it below)

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You mean does the 80s-based protocol that doesn't even support encryption support voice?

It doesn't support having messages received while you were offline

IRC supports one and one thing only: N-wise chats to connected clients. That and delusional nerds who like to think they're better than everyone else. Huge support for that too.

People who actually have sane standards for their instant messaging use the Matrix decentralized chat protocol when they need non-proprietary coms, or revolt

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago
[–] ulkesh 2 points 7 months ago

I find there is no shortage of delusional nerds who like to think they’re better than everyone else. Even here on Lemmy.

load more comments (2 replies)