this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
213 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10177 readers
32 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://archive.ph/sVDYB

Some key excerpts:

Senator Bernie Sanders this week unveiled legislation to reduce the standard workweek in the United States from 40 hours to 32, without a reduction in pay

The law, if passed, would pare down the workweek over a four-year period, lowering the threshold at which workers would be eligible to receive overtime pay.

Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Louisiana, said at the hearing such a reduction would hurt employers, ship jobs overseas and cause dramatic spikes in consumer prices.

Mr. Sanders is far from the first to propose the idea, which has been floated by Richard Nixon, pitched by autoworkers and experimented with by companies ranging from Shake Shack to Kickstarter and Unilever’s New Zealand unit.

Representative Mark Takano, Democrat of California, introduced the 32-Hour Workweek Act in the House in 2021, and has reintroduced it as a companion bill to the one sponsored by Mr. Sanders in the Senate.

In proposing the legislation, Mr. Sanders cited a trial conducted by 61 companies in Britain in 2022, in which most of the companies that went down to a four-day workweek saw that revenues and productivity remained steady, while attrition dropped significantly. The study was conducted by a nonprofit, 4 Day Week Global, with researchers at Cambridge University, Boston College and a think tank, Autonomy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 28 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I truly don’t see how doing so would adversely affect any company. If they need the additional labor an extra eight hours can provide, they can hire someone else at 32 hours/week to cover it with an overlapping schedule. If the business is smaller, they can pay overtime.

Anecdotally, my own job doesn’t require me to work eight hours every day. Shit, I’m lucky to do four hours of actual work in a day. The amount of work ebbs and flows, but I find myself more often than not watching YouTube on my work computer simply because there’s literally no more work for the day.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oof this screams out of touch though you see that right?

I'm a chef I work a lot. 11 hour shifts no break is common. 32 hour work week means I'm assured 8 hours OT + my already typical 2 hours OT every week.

For someone like me this is a huge pay bump or they hire someone and I get more time off. Either way is a win.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

11 hour shifts no break is common.

But they shouldn’t be and that’s the point.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 8 months ago

And so cutting to 32 hours a week helps. I didn't make this standard it just goes this way because of the career.

Truckers, Doctors, Nurses all deal with similar schedule issues and it is usually because we can't just hand out workload over you have to know what is going on, nobody can just walk in and take over.

[–] eveninghere 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tbf it's expensive to find a new hire. At least, that's the logic I rely on when arguing not to fire employees frequently.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh no! A company spending money on anything but the CEO’s next yacht is such an awful idea!

[–] eveninghere 2 points 8 months ago

Why not fix two problems? I don't expect a fair answer though.