this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
84 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Enterprise Linux on desktop?

Anyone using enterprise Linux on their desktop such as RHEL, Alma, Rocky, CentOS etc.?

I'm curious if it's easy to use for this purpose or if the older packages are a pain.

@linux

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Sort of

Not even close

Fedora Rawhide (?) == Opensuse TW

Fedora == Opensuse leap

RHEL == Suse enterprise

The higher ones are a testing ground for the one below, until you get to the actual product, the enterprise distros. They have completely different priorities

Red Hat was also a non-starter because of the lack of gaming functionality.

Unless you're running bleeding edge hardware, you can install the drivers just fine. Enterprise users also need GPUs. Flatpak solves steam in most cases.

[–] Secunergy@social.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@Shareni Not sure this comparison is correct

Fedora rather corresponds to OpenSUSE Tumbleweed or Debian Testing

Fedora Rawhide is very experimental, OpenSUSE once had a testing version, couldn’t find it now on the download page

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, I learned more about their lifecycles due to this thread.

I think you're correct as far as usability is concerned, but they've got a lot of similarities:

  • both are released as daily snapshots, that were only auto tested
  • those snapshots are frozen before an update and tested further
  • then they're released as a new minor/major version

The comparison really breaks with leap and sel. While fedora is directly upstream of rhel, both sel and leap are downstream from TW, and leap also has sel packages and so it's also downstream from it. But I think my point still sort of stands because it seems like they mainly implemented that to get additional testing for sel packages.

Usability and stability wise, a better comparison would be: fedora:tw -> centos:leap -> rhel:sel

[–] spaghetti_carbanana@krabb.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

TIL about Fedora, last I knew it was a rolling bleeding edge OS. Clearly lots of movement in the Red Hat camp.

As for gaming, drivers were not the problem for me. Getting games to run with ease was. On OpenSUSE, I just install Steam, enable Proton and basically go at that point. Red Hat was non-trivial to do this. Could be a skill issue, but I had a better time getting going with OpenSUSE TW.

[–] biribiri11@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fedora has been a thing since 2003, released alongside Red Hat Enterprise Linux after Red Hat Linux was discontinued. The gaming issues sound interesting, though. Did you have steam installed through rpmfusion, flatpak, or something else?

[–] spaghetti_carbanana@krabb.org 2 points 8 months ago

Sorry I meant TIL about it being considered stable, haha. I've known about Fedora because I used it when it was meant to replace the free Red Hat Linux.

As for Steam, I don't recall how I installed it, sorry! I just recall significant grief getting it going (again, perhaps a skill issue) but had no big roadblocks using OpenSUSE.

load more comments (5 replies)