this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
616 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

452 readers
2 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll busmittions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissure Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"
01-24 Film "Section 31"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

startrek.website is a partnership between /r/StarTrek and /r/DaystromInstitute from Reddit, they've both locked their subs over there for good. Follow @startrek for all your Trek needs. πŸ–– :trek:

#StarTrek

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] refugee@startrek.website 7 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Great of the mods to unilaterally decide for tens of thousands of users to lock and make inaccessible years and years of conversation. I'm sorry your fefes are hurt, but this "we had to destroy the village to save it" is some third-grade tantrum throwing bullshit.

[–] KonQuesting@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

You've just discovered the main problem with centralized platforms like Reddit, Discord, Twitter. The only thing stopping the mods from making a complete archive of the old platform is the Big Tech owners of Reddit. These corporate interests own all your posts, memes, and DMs, forever.

With federated platforms, the community leadership can easily backup, archive, or transfer everything whenever they like. That's the power of ownership.

[–] Lockely@pawb.social 15 points 2 years ago

Not only that, but copies of everything now exist on every single instance that's federated with startrek.website, so its potentially recoverable should something catastrophic happen.

[–] refugee@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that's fine. The mods, or whomever, have every right to go off and form another community, and the participants have every right to follow. The mods DON'T have the right to make the decision for me, restrict the content that I posted to a site they do not own, or otherwise interfere with my right to enjoy the archival content that they did not create. Hopefully the Reddit ownership will force the afflicted communities open sooner rather than later and let us each decide individually, rather than be subject to the whims of some babies that think an entity doesn't have the right to manage it's own tech.

[–] Powderhorn 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The mods DON’T have the right to make the decision for me, restrict the content that I posted to a site they do not own, or otherwise interfere with my right to enjoy the archival content that they did not create.

Source?

[–] refugee@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just like, my opinion, man. But to be fair I should rephrase - in the context of moderation they clearly have the right to keep content to community standards, and that may involve those actions, but beyond that, they have no right to act as the "owners" of that content, which is self-evident, as one of the complaints is that Reddit owns the content.

[–] Powderhorn 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That probably came across more snarky than intended. It actually felt softer than "Where'd ya read that?"

Here's the thing: Nowhere is it stated that you have the right to view content you posted in perpetuity, to say nothing about things posted by others. And mods have free reign to do whatever they want despite community wishes even if they rarely exercise that right.

Essentially, this whole situation has exposed a lot of realities with regard to users' rights on corporate platforms that you're in fine company in being aghast at.

Gmail could get the ax tomorrow. Will it? No ... but it's folly to expect it to continue forever because tomorrow's covered. The internet was the starting point of "you'll own nothing and love it" with your data. This is one of the results of the Faustian bargain.

[–] refugee@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's cool, and I get your perspective. Here's mine - I understand why some people are upset and no longer wish to support Reddit. The "right" thing to do, IMHO, would have been to start another community, explain why, and give people the option of migrating - pin it at the top or something. If you want to be more forceful, lock the sub so that no new info can be posted. As it is now, a small group of people unilaterally took action to "punish" Reddit and in doing so assumed control over my (the universal my - not my specifically, although I'm obviously included) content. That makes the mods no better than the corporation they're trying to protest, they're just using my content to different ends.

Bottom line - each individual should have had the choice to boycott or not boycott.

[–] Powderhorn 2 points 2 years ago

I totally get where you're coming from and have a Trek-related analogy: the trope about planets with friendly, generous people ... who happen to be killing children or obeying an evil computer as the price of their utopian society. Not paying attention to the inner workings of a site because they don't currently negatively affect you doesn't change that Reddit and its mods have always had the ability to pull the shenanigans we're going through.

Having been through an abusive marriage, red flags hit a bit different (and are more numerous). I can prefer things went differently, but my opinion has no impact on the facts in play, and I'm sure as hell not willing to forgive without so much as the perfunctory "it'll never happen again" ... they're literally saying "it will happen again."

So I've chosen to cut my losses now. It's irritating that I'm having to navigate new waters because of the decisions of others, but it also brings into specific relief how much power those others had over my media consumption and mental state.

I'm certainly not trying to tell anyone a different reaction is inappropriate, just provide context they may not be thinking about. I'd probably be in the stubborn and indignant camp were I still in my 20s, after all.

[–] samthurston@awscommunity.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@refugee @Powderhorn

Maybe I don't understand the mechanics of what has happened. Can you not access your own posts from the locked subs?

In any case this is unfortunately a consequence of reddit delegating moderation to the community : clearly the mods did have the "right" or at very least the "authority" to do what they did.

[–] Powderhorn 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've not been back to check on what things look like. My best guess would be that you can still see your full content in your profile, just not from anywhere it was posted.

@Powderhorn that's what I assumed, meaning you can take your content wherever you like, including another subreddit if you want

[–] Doog@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, because moving to a platform free from profiteering owners, an objective improvement to the community, is clearly just because fefes were hurt...

[–] Stoat@mastodon.scot 14 points 2 years ago

@refugee

First time moving website?

[–] lucas@fitt.au 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@refugee @Stoat between google and the wayback machine, lots of reddit is still available, just not on reddit

[–] kinyutaka@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

@lucas I rescued one post that I oddly cared about, because people kept finding it on Google and necroing it.

@startrek @Stoat @refugee

[–] qat@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

claims that others' "fefes are hurt" and says this is "some third-grade tantrum throwing bullshit"

turns out their own "fefes are hurt" and they proceed to engage in "some third-grade tantrum throwing bullshit"

[–] refugee@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

I mean, I'm not the one running around and breaking things, but ok.

[–] TheCookieButter@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would rather see a permanent freeze instead of private. Yes it helps Reddit slightly more than private subs, but there is years of discussion that could be kept while still making it obsolete and limiting reddit's income/users from it.

[–] Lockely@pawb.social 5 points 2 years ago

I prefer they stay private for now to direct users, and then once July 1 happens, they can re-open as restricted for a limited time.

[–] refugee@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

Sorry - the downvotes have made me realize that "we had to destroy the village to save it" isn't third-grade bullshit, it's kindergarten bullshit. But please, play on, those, like, 5 of you who decided that it was your call to dump years of posts into oblivion because the platform that supported your conversation for years decided they'd had enough of freeloading.