You Should Know

276 readers

1 users here now

YSK - for all things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules

1-All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help yourself improve on activities, skills and various other tasks in life.

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things, not for facts and figures.

2-In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why YSK:"

3- Non-factual ideas or concepts based on conspiracy theories will be removed.

4-No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

5-Any type of spamming will get you banned.

Partnered Communities:

To partner with our community and be included here, you are free to message me or comment on our pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

clueless_stoner@lemmy.world

MrsPkeaton@lemmy.world

_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world

533

YSK it's either "should have" or "should've". "Should of" is incorrect (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ronaldtemp1@lemmy.world to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Why YSK?

The first person who typed "should of" probably heard of it in real life that was meant to be "should've", they typed "should of" online and readers thought that it's grammatically correct to say "should of" which is in fact wrong and it became widespread throughout the years on Reddit.

I hope something could start to change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] _n9@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've seen "should of" in a book before. I think it was house of leaves, that had a bunch of them in it but it was only from one characters perspective if I remember correctly, so it might have been a stylistic choice. Still recommend the book though.

[–] RedundantObsession@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I have that book, but never read it. Too many foot notes, for one, some of them could of been chapters by them selves! (Sorry)

Is it a "correct" or easier way to enjoy the book? Is it meant to be "different" in that way? I've only heard good things about it, so really would like getting to it. My go to time wasting social media is no more a part of my life, so now at least I have the time...