this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22059 readers
21 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i think it is a moral imperative (or at least, unambiguously morally justifiable in all cases) to wage armed struggle against a country doing apartheid like Israel, so it's basically irrelevant for my purposes that Israel's justification for the blockade is "these people waged armed struggle against me"--the oxygen of that armed struggle as it currently exists is the apartheid. if anything it just demonstrates that Israel's government so devalues Palestinian life (as is also being demonstrated by their cavalier attitude toward murdering civilians) that it'd rather continue the oppression that's led many Palestinians to jihadism in the first place than ever reconsider whether that approach will lead to stability in the region and long-term peace
So unguided rockets vaguely aimed at cities, suicide bombers (including the use of children and mentally impaired people as suicide bombers), random stabbings, random shootings are "armed struggle" now? The mere fact that they are using children, old and handicapped people as suicide bombers, including in this current conflict, shows that if there's one side not valuing Palestinian life at all, it's Palestinian leadership.
Oh, and it's also statements like these:
https://www.memri.org/reports/hamas-leader-ismail-haniyeh-we-need-blood-women-children-and-elderly-gaza-%E2%80%93-so-it-awakens
How on Earth do you deal with this kind of political leadership? It's not just Hamas, that's how all sorts of groups and Palestinian governments have fought for many decades. How do you achieve "long-term piece" in this kind of situation? Like I said, any kind of concession gets answered with violence and any past peace deal, including the last one that would have resulted in 95% of the West Bank in Palestinian hands, gets rejected by one side and one side only. The current settler problem wouldn't even exist had Arafat not walked away from the Camp David summit after saying no to every proposal. He lived out his days as a billionaire though, so I guess we know why he did it. I guess he feared for this power and wealth, just like Hamas' leadership with their billions. Gotta keep that conflict going so that aid comes in that they can then steal from the people right out in the open while delusional idealists - no offense - meander on about high-level concepts like apartheid and oppression, blind to the actual reality.
well yes, definitionally, that's how armed struggle is manifesting in Palestine currently. there's nothing you or i can do about that.
but that's a little besides the point, which is that i think you at most selectively take issue with morally depraved military actions. almost everything you're charging Hamas with has an established and equally immoral analogue in Israel's strategy toward Palestine to this point. it's conspicuous to me, for example, that you do not seem to comparably weigh Israel damaging or destroying 70% of Gaza City with Hamas's unguided rocket attacks--especially given that both have led to large numbers of civilian deaths? like, do you think that 70% of Gaza City harbored Hamas militants, or, alternatively that it was militarily necessary to do that sort of damage even though it was inevitable large numbers of civilians would be caught in the crossfire? that seems like the only way for this to not boil down to vibes of who's "good" and "bad"
and mind you, i have no issue with saying that Hamas is a depraved terrorist group who should never be in power and that it's very, very bad for the region that they are now the primary credible opposition to Israel in Palestine. if i had my way, they would be unilaterally eradicated in favor of Fatah who at least seem willing to work toward a peaceful resolution. but i don't have a magic wand, and Hamas does not exist in a vacuum. the Israeli state is directly complicit in making them that primary credible opposition, both through its military strategy and through selectively looking the other way when money and weapons are funneled through back-channels to the group. even Israeli outlets admit to this sort of arrangement under Netanyahu.
I honestly don't know, but I can guess why they are doing it that way. I read one report that in one suburb of Gaza City, almost half of all buildings were rigged with explosives by Hamas. In another place, there were traps using speakers that played children's cries, in yet another location, Hamas used an old man as a suicide bomber. How do you fight in such an environment? Israel is choosing a cautious approach using air power and tanks, which limits the risk to their own soldiers - and successfully so, given the low death toll on their side we've seen. I totally get that they are prioritizing that over protecting civilians that have been taught from the crib to kill all Jews. Should they instead choose a riskier approach that might endanger their own people? I think every nation would prioritize their soldiers over civilians from the opposing side. It's still awful, there's no way around it, but seriously, what choice do they have? It's just terrible options and those in charge in Israel have to pick the least terrible one.
Fatah has a "martyr's fund" worth hundreds of millions that they use to pay out to the families of those who die in the fight against Israel, including members of Hamas. They paid millions to the families of terrorists who died during the October 7 attack.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_Authority_Martyrs_Fund
Abbas literally has a PhD in Holocaust denial. Fatah are really no good options either and on top of that, they have zero credibility among Palestinians due to how ineffective and corrupt their government is.
They also did it, because they thought they could pacify the group, make them interested in governing and enriching themselves instead of waging war. It seemed to have worked for a long time, as evidenced by billions siphoned off into in off-shore accounts, but hindsight is 20/20. The thing is though, there was significant international pressure against Israel to allow these funds into Gaza, including from foreign governments and humanitarian groups, many of which are now using the fact that the Israeli government permitted the transfer of these funds against it or are even frequently distorting it into "Israel funded Hamas" or "Israel created Hamas".
Like I said, there are only terrible options. This seemed like the least terrible one at the time and since there are no magic wands, there are rarely ideal solutions.
respectfully: if you yourself have to begin an answer to these questions with "I honestly don’t know," and then go on to talk about how Israel might be prioritizing its own soldiers over civilian life because even the civilians "have been taught from the crib to kill all Jews," perhaps you can understand how some of us would conclude that Israel might not care very much about Palestinian civilians and consider them both acceptable collateral damage or actual military targets based on the sheer number of them they've killed to this point
I think we should all do that, including you.
I didn't make that part up:
https://unwatch.org/un-teachers-call-to-murder-jews-reveals-new-report/
Seriously read this, including the full report. It explains so much about this conflict.
They care less about Palestinian civilians than they do about their own soldiers, but they care enough about them to invest massive amounts of resources into warning them, into getting aid to them and into getting them out of the parts of the strip that are most dangerous to them. That's more than can be said about anyone else in this conflict. Is it perfect? Hell no, but nothing in this world is and nobody in their right mind would expect them to be perfect.
We don't even know how many have died. Seriously, we have zero clue, only made-up numbers from Hamas - who also don't differentiate between civilian and military deaths, by the way - and rough estimates from everyone else. All we know for certain is that thousands have died. That's it. It took Israel weeks to come up with the total death toll on their side after the October 7 massacres and that's in a much more controlled environment, yet everyone immediately accepts whatever the "Gaza Health Ministry" under full Hamas control pumps out. I've lost count of how many have sent me articles from BBC, Reuters, NYT and whoever saying that they reported on the numbers and I should take them seriously and yet every single time, these articles cite the same Hamas organization or someone who cites them.
Again, this is a terrible war and thousands have dying in it, but it's not just a war of bullets and bombs, but also one of information being used a weapon, including misinformation, like completely nonsensical comparisons that I debunked earlier. So many educated, well-meaning people appear to lose all sight of reason, anything resembling critical thinking skills in this and for what? Do any of these people really think that it actually helps Palestinians?