this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
209 points (100.0% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

102 readers
1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Join us on Matrix Chat

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have seen that the lemmy.ml mods will openly ban discussion about the CCP. I am wondering if the sh.itjust.works team allows criticism of government bodies, while still banning racism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OrdinaryCrackEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Yeah idk what could possibly be the motivator for that, I mean it's not like they're currently in the middle of any genocides right? Or posturing about invading a certain island neighbour? Nah no way, they'd never do that!

[–] upperleft@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago (11 children)

As i stated: "The Chinese Communist Party is absolutely not above criticism"

There is a point at which the criticism becomes a weird fetish though, and that is something that was a common occurrence on reddit. Likely moreso tied to nationalist politics and rabble rousing foreign policy that I personally have a disdain for.

[–] GarlicFries@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unusual to word it as a fetish. Would you say there's a weird fetish for American focused criticism? Makes sense to me that the largest nations that have the most influence globally and all countries and companies have to tiptoe around garners the most focus and criticisms.

[–] skogens_ro@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Preoccupation perhaps? I'd say a lot of people on the have a preoccupation with US-focused criticism. Though I agree it makes sense that countries like the US and China garner a lot more attention than say, Czechia or Kyrgisistan.

It's the extent of it that can get weird. It's everywhere. A thread about a knife attack in France is not an appropriate place to dunk on American shooting statistics.

[–] upperleft@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will say that I am personally more critical of the US, as I am an American, and therefore I feel personally responsible for the actions of my own government (even though I realistically have no personal control over it).

[–] Ergonomic_Keyboard@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Something about reading a person with no power feeling responsible for the practices of the upper echelons of power and control makes me feel sad. Like the propaganda worked or something. I feel like there's a parallel to the environmental accountability. I can't remember the name of the approach, but it's very much a thing that:

Where one has power and control in minority, instead of dealing with it, make it seem as though the wide majority without power, control or benefit of X is in fact responsible for X, and they should feel bad and take accountability for X. Even though the unfortunate majority had no say in how the runnings of it were decided.

-edit-

  • accountability evasion
  • Responsibility diffusion
  • passing the buck.
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)