this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
179 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37746 readers
55 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] coffeejunky 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Electric, not really sure if this is a real question or sarcasm.

[–] sanzky 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they probably mean the e-bikes are also electric vehicles.

[–] coffeejunky 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok fair point, it's pretty clear in this case it's about bikes vs cars, but technically correct.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand why it needs to be electric bikes vs electric cars when it should be electric vehicles vs non-renewable fuels. Electric bikes have the same problems as electric cars, just on a slightly smaller scale. The rubber in their tires causes microplastics, they're fueled by electricity which may come from non-clean sources. They have more down sides, like not as many people can use them at once, you're not gonna see people in rural areas adopting them - or most places in the US - because of the distance required to get to a store or whatever.

I think infighting here is stupid.

[–] coffeejunky 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did you read the article? Because there is zero infighting and it's not about cars vs bikes. The article is basically just saying that everyone is looking at electric cars, but electric bikes and mopeds actually have much more impact at the moment. That is because in a lot of Asian countries these are the default mode of transport. It's way cheaper to replace fossil mopeds with ebikes and emopeds.

Also what do you mean not as many people can use them at the same time? These things have pretty small battery packs, you can just charge them at a regular socket in your house.

Also an ebike is way lighter than a car so the amount of microplastics is way less.

Your whole point about distance? The article starts that 60% of trips in the US are less than 10KM, easily done on an ebike or emoped.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Who cares what it is? Just choose to trust