this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Watches
10 readers
1 users here now
A community for watch & horology discussion.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My hot take is that people with this hot take are just looking for things to complain about. It's just a way to label a style of watch. It's like saying "calling a chronometer a chronometer is dumb because all watches measure time and that's what chronometer means."
A dive computer will outperform any dive watch, so should we just stop using the term dive watch? No because it's a useful way to categorise the style of watch that every understands
I'm not complaining, I just think it's a little silly to talk about the practicality of watches that are inherently inpractical. The labeling isn't what I'm talking about. It's about how some people talk about the watches. Liking submariners or speedmasters or something because one appreciates their beauty, craftsmanship, history, etc is one thing, but talking up their performance specs is another. Here's an example of what I'm talking about
A G Shock will do every one of those functionalities singfiicantly better so it's just funny to me to have that be the sort of sales pitch.