this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Watches

10 readers
1 users here now

A community for watch & horology discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a post from a few days ago, I noticed that someone mentioned that they were afraid to post about their dislike of the Tudor BB58 for fear of downvoting. You know what? The BB is a boring watch that's not worth the money, and Tudor wouldn't be half as popular as it is without the connection to Rolex. If Rolexes were as attainable as they were in past years, cut that by a factor of 10. Would you really buy a BB if the reality were that you could just save a little bit more and get a Rolex Submariner? That's my hot take. What's yours?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Reimu64@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Grand Seiko spring drive watches are too thick compared to other watches, but it rarely gets mentioned given how unique the movement is.

Also, lug to lug measurements are more important than case size measurements for a good fit.

[โ€“] Stowa_Herschel@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you! I like Grand Seiko, especially their hi beat stuff.

But SD models are comically thick. I hope to live to see the day GS makes a 9mm thick SD with a date. With a DOMED crystal.