Programming

423 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Ironclad - an OS kernel in Ada (ironclad.nongnu.org)

submitted 1 year ago by ada@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-port from: https://programming.dev/post/5377847

Ironclad is a formally verified, hard real-time capable kernel for general-purpose and embedded uses, written in SPARK and Ada. It is comprised of 100% free software, free in the sense that it respects the user's freedom.

Some of the supported features are:

A familiar POSIX-compatible interface.

True simultaneous preemptive multitasking.

Advanced cryptography and a security-centered architecture.

Mandatory Access Control (MAC).

Highly configurable, hard real-time scheduling.

Support for several architectures and boards.

Today (4 Nov 2023) at 14:00 UTC the author will preset it on Ada Monthly Meetup!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

safety qualifiable software

Automotive

Pretty sure the auto industry avoids safe software

[–] huntrss@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you mean this?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's a general (maybe meme-y) feeling that car manufacturers are just slapping software where they shouldn't, and it's shit software. One of the most recent cases is Tesla recalling several self driving cars.

Also, getting hacked remotely because the majority is as safe as a typical IoT gadget.

[–] huntrss@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough. There are pretty pedantic processes to qualify automotive software, but these are obviously not perfect and bad quality software may still be deployed to the cars.

However, I would not throw OEMs like Tesla and others into the same category regarding Software quality.

[–] ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like Tesla especially is one that's subject to this criticism.

[–] huntrss@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they also live after the mantra "move fast and break things", in cars that literally means breaking bones.

[–] ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

The idea that Tesla has that mindset in production and not just the design process is really funny to me

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Because the "car software" that comes to people's mind is most likely to be the infotainment system, which generally sucks, while the hard/safety critical stuff is invisible to them (and admittedly done by 3rd parties like Bosch)