this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023

55 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13049 readers

1 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Space

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

55

Professor plagiarizes prostate cancer imaging review paper and blames ghost writer. (retractionwatch.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de to c/science

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One isn't much better than the other lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TyrantTW@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the comment, that was very insightful. I'm not sure I fully agree with this definition of plagiarism in academia though, but rather I am familiar with a broader one that includes both willful prearranged plagiarism and even self plagiarism.

In academia, the main discriminating factor to establish plagiarism would be the presence or absence of references, so in this case it would mean that the review would have had to include the ghostwriter as an author directly (and hence wouldn't be a ghostwriter anymore 😉