this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7293 readers
1 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] millie 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I really hope that we find the first Martian fossil before I die, or like, drill into Europa and get some video of a probe being eaten by a squid the size of a stadium. It's kind of crazy to have grown up with this idea that there almost definitely isn't and never was other life in the solar system and now be seeing more and more how wrong that might be.

[–] upstream 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In our solar system the earth is perfectly placed for life.

The assumption that rivers are a key ingredient for life is speculative and correlation-driven.

It seems logical, but I’m pretty sure you can find planets with rivers and no life. We just don’t have the data to support the theory.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems logical, but I’m pretty sure you can find planets with rivers and no life. We just don’t have the data to support the theory.

Very true but I would say a better question would be "Is there a plant with no rivers and life". From my understanding water and rivers were a huge part of how life became on Earth. I don't know if I would go as far as saying it is required but I would say the odds of life is much higher with rivers then without rivers. At least from the data we have to go on.

[–] upstream 1 points 1 year ago

At least with the data we have to go indeed.

As I said, it seems logical. But black swans and stuff, right?

load more comments (2 replies)