this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
1014 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
18 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not saying I disagree but methinks many of you don't realize everything we use fossil fuels for from plastic to fertilizer it's not just gas. You think costs are spiralling out of control now.... oooh boy just wait.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't say we should get rid of all plastics. Some of it is required for medical purposes and food safety.

I would love for governments to grow some balls and start fighting against climate change. But in the case that that doesn't happen (and it probably won't because money). I would rather take price increase and inconvenience in exchange for a planet that's still livable in 100 years.

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

we could also use some responsible disposal rules for plastics to prevent them from ending up in our circulatory systems and oceans.

[–] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's true, we need fossil fuels for so many things besides transportation. At the same time, we are simply running out of fossil fuels. Even if we ignore the impact on the environment completely, there will be a point in the not too distant future when there will simply be nothing left to pump.

So what I am wondering is, even if one thinks man made climate change is a hoax or something similar, shouldn't the first and foremost thing everyone agrees on be to still spare those scarce resources? For things we really ("really") need to make from oil?

The first thing that comes to mind (maybe since I work in the lab) is medical equipment. You don't really want to have to wash and reuse things like catheters, do you? I am not sure if bioplastics (i.e., still plastics, but made from plants) would be an alternative here once we run out but I sincerely hope so.

Prices will go up, in any case, and it will be a painful transistion. But now we are at a somewhat luxurious point where we can still make this transistion somewhat controlled and "smoothly". If we continue to treat oil as a never ending resource and then do a surprised pikachu face once there is nothing left this will be much much worse, won't they?

[–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We already know how to create plastics from CO2 extracted from the air and hydrogen from water. There is no shortage of raw material for plastics. The main question for the industry is cheap plastics and the answer to that has always been cheap oil and gas.

Using proven reserves and current consumption you get to 47 years and things run out. That's a "within my lifetime" number for many.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Nail on the head! It's not that we can't make products from something other than curde oil, it's just by far the cheapest. To a lot of people the economy is more important than the environment.

We can make plastic out of fucking algae if we wanted. Doctors aren't going to run out of gloves because a bunch of internet autists decided to blow up a coal plant.

I'd be more worried about the people on O2 and life support who need access to electricity. It's why I support forcing power companies to switch to renewables so we can transition humanely. Note that holding shotguns to oil execs' heads to make them sign the paperwork is in no way inhumane :P

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 year ago

So my understanding out of this is that we need a government that takes responsibility and raises taxes on the cheap oil and gas to move the industry in the right direction. And we need a system where politicians aren't being paid by companies so they make decisions in their favor.

As a last point I'd like to mention that by that time there will be bio fuels and bio plastics. I am hoping that we will move to those within those 47 years.

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if we ignore the impact on the environment completely, there will be a point in the not too distant future when there will simply be nothing left to pump.

unfortunately the last two decades of discovery have provided ample petroleum and natural gas sources that won't be exploited unless we commit to fully and intentionally cooking the atmosphere.

we're not going to run out of petroleum, which will make it even harder to get people to leave it behind.

[–] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

We have plenty of rope with which to hang ourselves.

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 3 points 1 year ago

We're working on all sorts of alternatives for fuels and for the plastics as you mention. I think we'll be fine as far as that's concerned. I agree that prices will go up and it will be hard. And it's up to governments to deal with these things responsibly.

The main issue is politics in a broken system and politicians being paid by companies that don't have our best interests in mind. How do we fight back?

Oh and trains. We need lots of trans because cleaning power supply is easier and cleaner than making batteries for trucks.

[–] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

If you think prices will be high without the use of fossil fuels, oooh boy just wait for the coming climate collapse that will obliterate all modern agriculture, create billions of climate refugees, decimate human civilization as we know it, and end all global supply chains.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plant based plastics are a thing.

Really, the only way we are going to ween ourselves off fossil fuels successfully is if they are more expensive than the alternatives. I hear shit like that all the time (big example is meat alternatives). Simply removing the subsidies that fossil fuels do enjoy would go a long way toward making them less attractive.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right, I think. But isn't that the entire problem ? government collusion with private interests ?