this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
346 points (100.0% liked)
Lemmy
496 readers
1 users here now
Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.
For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe we should agree on a default landing server, and throw it on a scaling AWS instance?
I looked around for an instance like a landing server and found lemm.ee. The admin advertises the intention of this instance to be something like a landing server, so maybe direct confused people to there and let them explore after settling in?
I'm curious though, is the intention of the federation also that you move onto different instances later on? As you should be able to access everything from everywhere anyway, this should not be necessary I presume?
The way I see it, the benefit of federation is that it gives you the option/freedom to move to another instance later on while still being able to access all the network’s content.
I’m not sure if lemmy currently has this feature, but for example Mastodon allows a user to move their account to another instance. It’s not necessary for someone to move their account, but having the ability to is nice. A way to think about it is that it builds the ability to flee an instance into the platform itself, but doesn’t penalize the user from fleeing an instance. Unlike reddit where people are fleeing but now they lose access to all the content reddit has.
You could also just have a website that 1. Selects a random instance from the ones currently available and up and 2. Shows all instances and whether they are up or down. This would encourage new users to not all pile on to the same instance.
I'm not very knowledgeable about this stuff (what's a docker? What's a kubernetes? Lol) but I don't think as of right now with Lemmy, kbin, etc you can just throw a bigger single server at the problem. Anyways, that's kinda against the purpose of decentralization anyway. I know you're supposed to pick a server based on what one you like, rules or whatever but right now they're pretty much all equivalent (except lemmygrad, lol)
Surely not a random instance. Lots of instances are niche or have more strict requirements on the user, even if they're public.
I'm saying again, there should be a way for instances to better propagate their interests/philosophy/politics/communitues and for the user to pick one based on that.
So something similar to http://www.distrochooser.de?
I know that site is specifically about choosing a Linux distro, but the idea is the same.
Answer questions with certain options, it will calculate based on the criteria you fed it, and then it will give a rating list of what instance is the best option for you.
Highest on the list being What met the criteria you provided. Lowest being what did not meet the criteria.
No, that's too complicated. We're talking a signup for a web service, that needs to be very simple.
I'd take just a single page with selection of interests. I think some community/multimedia apps already do something like that. Then maybe another page with stuff like "it's fine if I need to wait for approval" or "I can provide an email address" or whatever may be...
But definitely needs to be simple.
https://join-lemmy.org/instances
Should work for that, they just need to have a good newbie page with a curated selection of generic servers at the top, with a random one selected, maybe based on location?
Is the instances really a major barrier to entry, It seems no different to me than picking an Email provider.