World News

22058 readers

8 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Chinese censors to restrict use of AirDrop and Bluetooth, activists fear it will further hinder their ability to mobilise people and share information (web.archive.org)

submitted 1 year ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/news

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Bluetooth, AirDrop and such file-sharing services are crucial tools in China, where the so-called Great Firewall has resulted in one of the mostly tightly-controlled internet regimes. In recent years, anti-government protesters have often turned to AirDrop to organise and share their political demands. For instance, some activists were sharing anti-Xi Jinping posters using this tool on the Shanghai subway last October - just as the Chinese president was awaiting a historic third term as the country's leader.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Venus@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just saying that someone said something is not citing a source. They taught us this in elementary school.

[–] kitonthenet@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Why, you’re right! We should go back to the original source, just like we were taught in elementary school, to see what the source says.

Will you look at that! The primary source has a handy article that’s already been linked to you! Here it is again, in case you missed it :)

http://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-06/06/c_1687698272954687.htm

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The source is the Chinese government, @kleinheld provided the link, everyone can easily verify that.

[–] Venus@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

That's really not relevant unless the user mentioned wrote the article. I'm criticizing the article for not citing sources.