wipasoda

joined 1 year ago
[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

fuck I feel stupid, I saw that page but I thought it was only the .jpeg file.

But unfortunately it does not run under Wine :(

0024:err:dmloader:IDirectMusicLoaderImpl_SetObject : could not attach stream to file L"C:\\windows\\system32\\drivers\\gm.dls", make sure it exists 0024:err:winediag:MIDIMAP_drvOpen No software synthesizer midi port found, Midi sound output probably won't work. 0124:fixme:d3d:state_linepattern_w Setting line patterns is not supported in OpenGL core contexts.

Or whatever the problem is, idk. Thanks anyhow...

 

Name of game: PacShooter 3D

 

Name of game: PacShooter 3D

[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

1-3 a range? So that means: None, All, AND Abort? But that's contradicting.

I'm using a relative fresh install of manjaro gnome though, I never installed this ivpn package before

 

reading "Build Files Exist" seems to suggest the package already exists, but it's not, I think.

So what is "CleanBuild" and what do the options mean: [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]t Installed

And is meant by (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4) ?

[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

true but generally speaking one could say he who makes abundance for us all, deserves more.

[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don’t live in a zero sum game though.

Perhaps. I never stated that we are. I was just pointing to a hypothetical world with limited resources, and what then would be most appropriate.

[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

you do have a point in the sense that if we live in a utopia, I think there is good reason to think that it shouldn't matter what choices people make, they all get the same 'reward'/financial outcome/etc.

You said:

If the world has the resources to allow it, then why should one person be punished for chasing their joy while another is rewarded?

Yes okay, but what if there are limited resources? Or a world that needs improvement? Isn't it then better to incentivize people to work hard to make our world of limited resources a world of abundance? If yes, then it means to give those a higher reward at the expense of those who made "other choices".

Are we now living in a world of limited resources / that needs improvement? If yes, then it would probably be justified to take from those who made "other choices"

[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Well to a certain degree I guess. They're never going to be as equal as numbers can. What is even meant by men and women being "equal"? Equality of opportunity?

[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

im not even mad, that's amazing