I was visiting there in 2019. Of the hundreds of thousands of balconies there, I saw less than a hundred with lights on ~10pm.
It's far away too. ~18km to get there from Iskandar Puteri (not intensely dense, but sees some traffic due to legoland), and ~35km from Johor Bahru (the main city area of Johor).
They must have done the whole build it and they will come thing before realising no one wants to live in a ghost town.
At least it looked kinda impressive???
5.1 and 7.1 systems aren't all that widespread, even in the music industry. Surround kinda sits in the same place vr does for me. It's immensely cool, but it'll never become standard due to hassle and lack of support.
Most of the recent innovation in sound has been trickled down from the music and film industries. Just a general increase in the capabilities of soft synths and a better understanding of foley, alongside dedicated in house recording studios have raised the bar of audio.
To be honest I agree with you that sound is overlooked, sound engineers truly are unsung heroes. I mean even when people point out the sound in a game, it's usually directed at the composer.
I got curious myself and agreed, so I went looking.
A lot of sources specified that it was part of a technical requirements checklist, and...
Yeap. It doesn't explicitly require a "press any key" screen, but it gives a more pleasant screen to look at while you select a user. People online also say it's used to detect which controller is in use.
If you add a feature like this to a game, it becomes harder to maintain if there are discrepancies between builds. So presumably it's usually just left in rather than removed.
Most people here have already given you good answers. I'll just add to this by saying it depends on too many other factors, and add some of my own experience and calculating to support what other people are saying.
TL;DR : It doesn't matter, it's like around 1 DPR (damage per round) difference. If you care, use a DPR calculator to work out your ideal options
As far as I am aware, there are no agile attacks that have a damage dice higher than a d6 (for PCs), so my math will be done assuming that.
The way the math works out, you should want to use an agile attack for the third attack. It will be very unlikely to hit or crit, but it grants a better DPR than using a non-agile attack.
As for the second attack, it depends heavily on multiple factors:
1. What is the difference in dice size between the agile and non-agile attack, and how many damage dice do you have?
Higher differences in dice sizes will make the non-agile attack more preferable, as though you're 5% less likely to hit or crit, the damage if you do hit statistically makes up for that. Larger amounts of damage dice exacerbates this effect, as your non-agile weapon will pull a larger gap to the agile weapon.
2. What is your damage roll modifier?
A larger damage roll modifier rewards hitting more often, so agile weapons become more favorable if the modifier is larger. This also includes things such as the damage runes, where the damage dice of your weapon is irrelevant.
3. What chance do you have of critting or hitting the target?
If you have the chance to crit on rolls that are not nat 20s, your DPR with the non-agile weapon begins to trump the agile weapon. This is due to the crit doubling the difference due to damage dice size. The exact point at which this occurs depends on the above two factors as well.
Weirdly the DPR starts to swing the other way as the target's AC gets higher. As you exceed a roll of 9 needed to hit a target, your chance to crit is static at 5% (nat 20). This reduces the effectiveness of the agile weapon, but after that, the agile weapon starts to claw back its effectiveness as the non-agile weapon's ability to hit shrinks. Again, the exact point at which this occurs depends on the above two factors.
I plotted a few graphs to illustrate the above considerations. The attack roll modifier refers to the attack roll without any MAP, and the DPR calculations have factored in the MAP for the agile and non-agile weapons.
The first is a graph with a d8 non-agile weapon, a d6 agile weapon, and a +4 damage roll modifier.
Note the scale of the axis on the left, it doesn't make a significant difference for this set of stats.
Now what about a level 4 character without any class bonuses to damage, with the same weapons with all the expected fundamental runes, doubling their damage dice?
Note the fact that there isn't even a window where the agile weapon is good against weaker enemies, but it claws back much more effectiveness. This is what we'd expect due to the larger amount of damage dice.
Lastly to illustrate the effect of flat modifiers, I put up a level 7 swashbuckler with an Dueling Spear (d8 finesse) against a Shortsword (d6 agile finesse). They will have panache, and are making these strikes non-finishers. The weapons both have the expected fundamental runes, and a flaming rune.
Note how there is a larger range of ACs where an agile weapon is better.
The answer is it depends, as it always does. I can't give you a definite answer for every single scenario, because there are way too many, and I'm not your dad. In general the following you should make the second strike with an agile weapon if any of these conditions are true:
Otherwise, use you should use your non-agile weapon to make the second strike.
Note that the difference in DPR is small (it's like 1.2 at most), so it doesn't really matter which you choose. I'd go with an agile attack if I wanted consistency, and non-agile if I wanted burst.
That's it! If you read through all of this, thanks for reading my insane ramblings. There are many more things I probably forgot to account for, but I can't think of them right now, and I accidentally overwrote the sheet for the second graph. I'm gonna go do something more productive now.
I've been playing through it with a few of my pf2e group.
Larian did such an amazing job with this, and I am enjoying it, but I find myself wishing this game had the action economy from Div : OS2 or pf2e.
That said, I'm glad to see that they've continued the trend of their prior crpgs, and made something approaching the flexibility of a GM behind a screen.
Because they're effecfively measuring the change in the students' performance in the STROOP and ADD tests before and after a heat wave, baseline factors such as wealth and income should be controlled for.
They note in the results that in the initial tests there was no significant difference between both groups' results.
I never got it until I got Skyrim VR
So many soothing moments beneath an aurora, in a bustling tavern or just walking along a path
I was tentatively excited to get it before I saw the sheer amount of money grubbing. The existence of Last Epoch, Path of Exile and Grim Dawn made it a lot easier for me.
There seems to be a limit to how large a studio/publisher can get before it keels over into pure and utterly unashamed greed. Shareholders gotta make money I guess.
Huh, strange. Everywhere I looked online indicated that this pair of headphones has a single TRRS 3.5mm jack that comes with a usb adapter.
TRS (tip-ring-sleeve) and TRRS (tip-ring-ring-sleeve) indicates the number of channels on the 3.5mm jack. TRS is usually dual channel balanced (one channel for ground) whereas TRRS includes an additional channel for a mic.
As for all the other cable stuff, everything you've told me means that the troubleshooting for jacks and cables can stop there (I'm also assuming the echo happens in both ears and not just one). If we can't replace the cable, we can't tell if the problem is the cable or the headphones. I doubt the USB adapter will help either, unless JBL has some weird thing going on with that.
The echo being affected by your headphones volume control makes me think the internal wiring is miswired somewhere along the signal chain. You should still be able to use the headphones without the mic, so that's what I'd do.
I'm planning, in the far future, to buy a cheap DAC to plug-in a headphone, a microphone and an electric guitar so I can use all of them on the computer at the same time that I can use the headphones as monitors for the microphone and the guitar. Is this possible?
You're looking for an Audio Interface, not a DAC (although audio interfaces have DACs in them). There's a lot of options out there, and you'll have to assess the options based on your budget and use case.
I do not own this pair of headphones, nor do I use 2-in-1 headphones. But since no one has responded, I'll just throw whatever I can think of at you and see what sticks.
I am listing these to try and give answers. None of these should work, but they're easy to try and don't cost anything
These might work
This requires additional spending to confirm
I hope one of these work, because...
Get new headphones or claim warranty on them (if you have it). My cursory googling showed that this problem has cropped up with a reddit user, and they ended up buying new headphones. If you do end up buying new headphones, I highly recommend buying a solid pair of wired headphones and a mic separately. It'll be more cables, but much easier to swap out if things go wrong, and a good pair of headphones will last you a good 5+ years.
Best of luck, and let me know how it goes!
It's great. And a lot of work goes into tweaking that range of frequencies that goes unnoticed, unless the mix engineer screws up.
Imo the best thing you get from better headphones is clarity. Hearing intricately crafted neuro timbres just inspires me.
So I've been reading through this study and comparing it to modern health advice. For the most part, the 22% of energy threshold seems to be above 1.2-1.6 grams of protein per kg of body weight (for active individuals).
The functional advice is: following the guidelines from the FDA will keep you out of the risks outlined in the study.