the whole seeds do taste good but its a bit like chewing up some bits of wood
sqw
joined 1 year ago
very thorough!
if you thought crispr with gene drive was terrifying, wait till you get a load of this.
I always interpreted legal tender not to be a mandate to accept that form of payment in general, but rather a formally recognized method for resolving debt in the event of legal dispute.
Hmm, now that I think of it, in USA the supply of cash flows from banks and thus supply of cash, whether directly or indirectly, requires some association with them too... the alternatives seem to be barter, scrip, etc. But if it's illegal to freely trade directly between suppliers and the needful for basic necessities, that does at least seem objectionable.
I'm also thinking about "banking hours"/bank requirements constraining the ability of even bank account holders to garner those necessities freely.
Yes, for cases like you are illustrating here, seems to me that is forcing some association as you argue. Then again, it doesn't force a /specific/ association, as long as there is a free marketplace for banking with real options. However, even then it does still make a compulsory partition in that way.
Seems that case requires it for such engagements, but doesn't mandate it? If it can be refused freely, seems that would not violate?
under what circumstances do governments unconditionally force their citizens to get bank accounts?
first time ive encountered "bolide"
im sorry
view more: next ›
Postage and Handling