reinar

joined 1 year ago
[–] reinar@distress.digital 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are now refunding past their 30-day money back period if you didn't use cash. Just got a refund for a top-up made in February.

[–] reinar@distress.digital 1 points 1 year ago

They are claiming ProtonVPN port forwarding only works with Windows, however this is only relevant if you are using protonvpn app.

You can still generate wireguard config with nat-pmp support.
https://protonvpn.com/support/port-forwarding-manual-setup/

[–] reinar@distress.digital 3 points 1 year ago

it's most likely coming from postgres, db server tends to be the main resource hog.

[–] reinar@distress.digital 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, big instances are not ready to handle the traffic and could go down - see lemmy.ml

[–] reinar@distress.digital 13 points 1 year ago

Are all these thousands of lemmy servers useless?

almost. It's actually worse than that - when you subscribe to a community from your server it will fetch like 20 posts and that's it, you'll get only new stuff after that, so there's no possibility to do a full mirror of selfhosted, for example, if you started your instance today and didn't fetch posts and comments manually.

ActivityPub per se is just a spec on s2s/s2c communication, which is not a great thing since in many cases it assumes single source of truth, which potentially puts huge load on more popular instances.

I think a quick and dirty hack to this could be the following - each linked instance may maintain cache of announces (so there would be benefit of just forwarding original http signed requests w/o being afraid of malicious actor), which your instance could pull, this way you could populate your mirror without overloading the original source.
Distributed activities propagation though... Let's say there are some design steps involved to make this truly distributed, however I feel like it's possible.

view more: ‹ prev next ›