myfavouritename

I can't tell if you're trolling. But if you aren't, here's something cool you might enjoy.

If an object has two sides, you can colour each side a different colour. Think of a dinner plate. That has two sides and an edge that goes all the way around. You could use a marker to colour the front side red, stopping anywhere you hit an edge. Then you could use another marker to colour the back side blue, because the backside wouldn't be coloured yet.

It sounds like I'm explaining this in a dumb, very obvious way. I am. Not because I think anyone reading this is dumb. But because the shape in the photo does something that is not obvious.

Look at the shape above and imagine it without all the keys sticking out. Imagine it is smooth enough to draw on with a marker. It's pretty easy to see where any edges are. Imagine colouring one side of the shape red, avoiding where the edge is. If you keep colouring as much as you can, without crossing an edge, once you're done you'll find that there's no place left to colour with the blue marker. You'll have coloured the whole shape. It only has one side and that one side snakes and twists around to be its own backside as well.

If you're looking to learn more, the shape is called a Möbius strip.

I've made a couple of baby blankets and those are so satisfying. And I've been making touques for all the kids in my life and those are really fun projects too.

This is fabulous! Making pieces tiny enough for pets must be so satisfying. You can get so many projects finished so quickly.

I used to have this stance as well.

But my opinion on the situation changed when I noticed the ways that one class is waging war on the other classes in my country. There is real damage being done, real violence being perpetrated. Wage theft, poisoning the environment, suppressing voting and certain kinds of speech. Limited access to healthcare, limited access to education, limited access to the jobs that confer greater respect or mobility. Some people are living in a kind of hell and dying earlier because of it.

And those doing the violence are usually protected from the consequences of their actions by others in society saying just what you've said. "It's okay to protest, but don't inconvenience anyone while doing it". "It's theft to deny me the use of the road that you're blocking with the protest or the building that you're protesting in front of".

I used to think that protests where everyone remained polite were the only ones I could respect. Other kinds of protests, where people were being disruptive were just hooligans acting out. I used to say those things.

Maybe this way of thinking helps to preserve in some small way the politeness of society. I doubt it's effective at doing that in a meaningful way. And if there is a class of people who are oppressing another class, ending that oppression would be the most effective way of increasing the politeness of society as a whole, even if certain kinds of disruption was needed to get there.

One thing that I do know is true is that saying these things does help the bully class to continue doing what they are doing. They aren't going to stop just because someone asked nicely. They are being protected by words like this. And that's not okay.

That's a great point. I suppose one could tell how healthy the relationship is between developer and publisher by looking at how many dev companies on the roster have created a second great game. Of course, that's tough even with a great publisher, so maybe that's not realistic.

Wow. I've always trusted games published by Annapurna to be something exciting, new, and high quality. I'm devastated to hear that this publishing company is floundering.

I found a technique that worked well for me. I want to share with you and others, but I don't want to come across as judging you in anyway. It's hard to find great candidates of any sort. And I wouldn't necessarily recommend my technique to every company, because it's just not reasonable in all cases.

I've found that the best way to get a good mix of people hired onto the team is to do more than hope that it happens.

I had to get out to workshops, conferences, and meetups. Local universities had groups that I got in touch with. I had to make connections with the communities that I was looking to hire from. It was a lot of hard work.

But once you've developed those connections, candidates roll in with surprising regularity for a long time. After two years I had a team of 10 great devs with a 50/50 split between genders and a huge range of background and cultures. It was the most fun team to work with and we made awesome stuff.

I play a lot of board games. And I own a lot of board games. Not all of my games get played very much, so I like to track each play and over time see which games are forgotten gems or which games I'd be best to just trade away.

In the board game community, you might come across people talking about the "Friendless" metric of their collection. It's a totally made up measurement, invented by a person with the user name Friendless. In that way, it's like the Elo rating in chess and other games. I find it's useful to know when I'm "done" with something that doesn't really have an end, like playing board games. You can always play one more game.

Friendless hypothesized that if you play a game 10 times, you've gained 90% of its remaining utility. So after 10 plays, you consumed 90% of the game play that game provides. After another 10 plays, you're at 99%. By the time you reach 30 plays, you've consumed 99.9% of the game.

You can do the same with games. Maybe the number of plays changes a bit. Maybe it's not the number of plays, but the number of hours. I would say that games of Civ are like games of any other board game: 10 = 90% utility gained. Matches in COD, probably not the same.

This is a really interesting article. Thank you!

I'll totally agree that the author did not do a great job of stating their thesis plainly. However, I think that the article isn't incoherent. The author is writing about why they are surprised and disappointed that France and the Olympics gave Tom Cruise a global spotlight. They claim he's too much in bed with Scientology to make supporting him possible without supporting them. And they claim that France and french media should know better than to support Scientology.

I think it's a reasonable objection and I'm glad someone is objecting. Although, again, I agree that the article could have benefited from having that thesis clearly written from the start.

That is incredibly cute! Thanks

I love it!