lovestha

@mike The level of cryptic used makes me believe they are probably printing some with just changed art in the Marvel sets. And others will have UW treatments.

It may not even be settled which is going to have which done to it.

@counterspell another idea to shake it up a bit: the price limit is for cards with that name in you deck: one copy if it is 50c, two copies if it is 25c, etc.

Could even allow for going over 4 cookies for truely chaff cards

@counterspell Lemmy not federating post content does make things annoying

@counterspell nope. Deleting and reposting ;)

@andrew Elsewhere a friend dup up: it was in the earnings call.

So yeah, this directly contradicts WotC's position that they know how much to print. WotC just flat lying to us.

@andrew Anyone know where Hasbro has said this? As it obviously goes against WotC saying they know how to predict how much to print....

@nokturne213 @mike We are? Oh, I hadn't realised that :(

@prodigalsorcerer LGS will use them as prize packs to have cheaper events. It's shit but it will happen

@prodigalsorcerer @ech Except WotC keep replacing the empty booster slot with more new types of booster, so the less SKUs aspect is failing.

@ech @Fluid some of the 50% is that most places had kept prices flat for too long, the jump in pack prices from draft to play boosters came at the same time they needed to reset prices anyway.

That then gets conflated with drafts (and especially sealed) now be in ng a less good experience.

So the numbers are much worse, it still might be worth it, but I can't see anyone doing the 4 drafts a week I did in my 20's and I'm sad for today's kids in that situation.

@readthemessage undoutably, they can't admit that MH3 was a mistake too quickly

@bec remember 'creatures' only exist in play, every we here else they are 'creature cards'. This can be a handy way to remember that these effects care about the properties of the creature in play, not on the stack.