correcthorsedickbatterystaple

biblically accurate samsung galaxy s24

the only truth to the headline is the increasingly part - and it's because of articles like this.

Ford Executive Chair Bill Ford calls on autoworkers to end strike, says Shareholders' Income is at Stake.

i've just gained mine

Congress shall make no law

i think a lot of people misunderstand positive vs negative rights. the US Constitution doesn't grant rights. the Declaration of Independence declared all are endowed with rights by a creator. that is the origin of our rights - inalienable. the Constitution doesn't grant anything. it establishes the structure of a federal government, and the amendments to that guarantee what already exists in the Declaration. it limits power of an authority over a person.

a very divisive example is arms. the Constitution doesn't grant americans the right to keep and bear arms. it limits the government from prohibiting such.

of course...this is the intent not necessarily the reality

edit:
also the lack of critical thinking of this argument is so astounding i didn't even notice it at first...no freedom from religion...which...one? which version of that one...? the constitution - which compels nothing but the government - can...compel americans to all be...uh - jehovah's witnesses? mormons? sunni? bahai?

it's an anthology series, which, even if people understood before getting into it, could understandably be difficult to really separate oneself while viewing. think about another creator you like. Nolan, Spielberg, whatever. which of their works do you like best? does memento deserve criticism just because you liked interstellar more? or dunkirk? critique for sure, but that's just to continue to refine the origin of your personal enjoyment of each piece of work. they are by definition of anthology different works.

s1 is masterful. s2 is still as good as the best of shows made these days. same with s3. and looking forward to s4.

and really agree with the VV comment. was this guy for real or just a try hard? for me it's just fine when an actor's performance matches their character regardless of if it's genuinely good or...their ability fits the character traits. still entertainment to me.

there's no evidence you're not typing that comment because a gnome jumped up your butthole

1. we take as much wealth as possible by siphoning it from the populous.
2. the portion of the populous that had wealth enough to siphon is dying year by year.
3. the portion of the populous that's young has no wealth because we've been siphoning it already.
4. we've siphoned all the wealth there is and we still aren't satisfied.
5. pikachu face.

just wondering aloud here (genuinely - i'm not trying to be an ass)

are iphones sold from local shops? or just apple stores.

i think a lot of small business owners sell bread.

can buy a lot of bread after stealing an iphone

this...is news?

what?

1. don't see how 'clever' enters into it one way or another. it's certainly not a trait that reduces the chances of being a predator.

2. predators aren't people who can't find willing partners, they're people who want unwilling victims.

3. you heard about another rich celebrity that was just sentenced to 30 years for rape?

4. occam's razor says no such thing. the legal principle presumption of innocence says innocent until proven guilty.

how long would managers and executives continue working if literal sewage started seeping into their office and for how long would it continue to flow before the problem was solved