What? I want in! Where's this investor group?
brighthurst
I'm glad that yours is the top response. Have you also noticed that people on the fediverse seem extreme?
nostr is mainly used by bitcoiners (not a lot of crypto) right now. Moreover, scammy people love to advertise on new platforms.
GME is in crypto, though, so it's not like people should be anti-crypto.
Nostr is very young so they haven't really solved the bot problem yet, but there is activity there too. So right now it may seem sketchy but thats the case with all fresh platforms/protocols. Same thing happened with the Fediverse before they had account-creation controls
I'll start: web+nostr://nprofile1qqsddw5lgwkwfl9x65tld6c6vj8ujfa0jw5aa769nsx5ul4r0gdu8tqprdmhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8xetdd9ek7mpwv3jhvqghwaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8xetdd9ek7mpwv3jhvqgawaehxw309ahx7um5wgkhqatz9emk2mrvdaexgetj9ehx2aqpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3e8yetvv9ujucm0d5q3gamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvrca4u6
Your browser won't recognize this link unless you have set up a profile on a client like Coracle or Damus. The Nostr website has other clients listed.
This article makes me feel really stupid because it is making the case that there is some profound new discovery about consciousness when I see nothing profound whatsoever. To me, the most meaningful excerpt is:
Yes, and? So a baby learns from that the mobile directly correlates to its own leg moving and not moving? How is this anything profound and how do it explain anything new about consciousness? I don't mean to downplay novel new experiments (which this is), but I'm not seeing anything "groundbreaking," "profound," or the "birth of purpose." I get that understanding how infants learn is important, but I don't see anything new in these results, we've known about cause-and-effect learning for a long time.
If someone can edify me on any profound implications of this, I would be thankful.