Just one day after calling an attack on a bridge that killed like 3 people as terrorism,
Isn't it th Ukraine forces do terrorism attacks on Donetsk last 8 years?
basiliscos
joined 4 years ago
The numbers do matter in the case, becase even if 2 persons are fleeing the country, it is enough to state "The news itself that people are fleeing the country", right?
PS. Russian-language source referring Khazakhstan officials, there are around 34k left the Khazakhstan border in the last week (98k in, 64k out).
Instead of numbers we have satellite pictures: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russians-fearing-conscription-flood-border-georgia-mongolia-rcna49487
It is actually drone videos, not satelites' pictures. Anyway, they are qualitative, althought numbers from THAT video can be calculated.
Finland’s border control released these statistics yesterday: https://twitter.com/rajavartijat/status/1574376900256055296. So far it’s about 3000 Russians not returning per day.
Seems to be ok.
Of course I can try to check the actual numbers from several countries (if the actual and correct statistics are available), and that is something everyone can do :)
That's the main problem. It is not your not mine job of doing that. It is the original post journallist fucking job to that, i.e. gather numbers from officials and do own checks, and present them to readers! Instead the source feeds their readers with the arbitrary drawn number out of anywere; the number look OK in some reasable borders, but the "reasonable borders" it is quite vague notion, which vary from 10k to 1M.
" is now full of people leaving"
is not the number. You cannot jump from "qualitative statement" to "quantitative statement", because "full of people leaving" might vary from several hours of staying on the borders (hundrets) ... to tens of thousands. The numbers from Georgian/Mongolian/Belarussian officials, of couse, will likely be around true numbers, but they are missing too (in the article).
Have you got any proof this information here is propaganda?
What is the original source of the number 260k ? If it is "undisclosed source" (Kremlin’s security services) - that is non-proveable, as the other source can tell 1M or 5M ). So, it is propaganda (does not matter natos or russian) unless it tells some official person, which has access to that information.
The front line is quite large, so there is no enough manpower to streighten it. Recent Ukrainian successful counter-offence demostrated softness of the frontline, so doulbling manpower on the front seems work on mistakes.
The co2 emission methodology is not clean. The much more simple methodology would be how much cpu & gpu time spends client compuer by loading front-page. JS-bloated sites will obviosly anti-leaders, comparing to lemmy and https://old.reddit.com/
it is even worse as it is by Microsoft
Same for Russian
The sole EU is responsible for it's breaking up. Why put responsibility of that to the others?
There is a book about warcrimes of the Ukraine, published in 2020.
https://xn----7sbpbaoaekcpshybgimhugp5z.org/#p=2 . The things you are asking for starting from the page 365. It is in Russian, sorry.
There is a dedicated English-speaking telegram channel I know https://t.me/InfoDefenseEn, which is publishing mostly current events, and it also contains a lot of materials about warcrimes on the Ukraine.