archwizard

Note its not just climate thats causing the water shortage. The article even mentions that a bunch of that water is being used for livestock feed like alfalfa. It takes ~620 gallons of water to make a 150g hamburger and ~859 gallons for a gallon of milk (1). And 56 percent of the water of the colorado river is used for growing livestock feed (2).

Climate change is important to have in the conversation about our rivers drying up, but we can't forget about the elephant (or cow) in the room.

1: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X11004110?via%3Dihub

2: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/22/climate/colorado-river-water.html

CalyxOS on a Pixel 5. Its nice and micro G works fine in most situations. When I have the time though, I'm probably going to try graphine os with sandboxed google play and see how that works for me.

Just started listening. Boy, I wish I knew about it in March when I was starting my garden!

Thanks for creating it! I'm glad to be here (:

This is pretty similar to what I do. Except I just use ngnix to forward http requests through the wireguard tunnel based on the host header. Although theoretically you could also use the TLS server name.

I wonder if you could do this as a community project. Everyone could pitch in to cover the cost of the VPS and join their server to the VPN for small self-hosted projects like a website.

My app of choice is AntennaPod, mainly because its the best app I've found on FDroid.

Recently I've been listening through Newbie Star Trek, just because I really enjoy TNG and its nice to hear the discussions about it. I also listen to Security Now(since I do cybersecurity), the citizen's guide to the supreme court, and no bullsh!t vegan.

I need to do more reading and thinking on this topic tbh. I used to have a utilitarian/reduction of suffering approach, but utilitarianism, if you really put it to the test, has some weird implications (Peter Singer, The Experience Machine, the ones who walk away from omelas, etc), so I'm exploring a deontological approach, based mainly on Kant, with some minor tweaks.

Here's my current draft:

Act such that you treat sentient beings always as an end and never as a mere means.

The basic idea is that animals are beings with unique wants, needs, desires, and fears, so its wrong to disregard those by treating them as a mere means to an end.

I like this approach because it solves some problems with suffering based moralities (if I kill someone with no pain but I get joy, is that wrong?) And it also allows for mutually beneficial relationships with animals. For example, if I keep a companion animal, while respecting them as an individual, that's okay.

It also, I think, is useful when talking about, say, wool. Technically, shearing wool from sheep reduces the suffering of sheep, but the wool industry treats the animals as a mere means to their wool, which is wrong (and that's reflected in the way sheep are treated on those farms).

I do admit that it has some problems that need to be resolved. First, its difficult for me to argue that sentience is something intrinsically valuable. The difference between using someone as a means and an end simultaneously is also fairly gray. For example, someone could argue that killing animals isn't using them as a mere means as long as you "respect the animal" and use them for food. Which obviously I don't condone.

I think I need to read Korsgaard and a few other philosophers lol.

One of the reasons why I don't eat animals ):