Eat, trip, soil health, building materials & more.
apis
Trying to hope this will galvanise workers in Kentucky into unionising at last, but suspect it won't, and that Republican strategists are primed to roll out all the usual tactics to discourage it.
Oh no.
Hope you heal up quickly!
Don't be hard on yourself though - we're all aware of the hazard, but we all do it.
Managing with slightly warmed olive oil when mine itch, but still go in with an earbud from time to time.
And there was me thinking I was an only child!
For English boys of that background, it was common for hair to be left long until they were old enough to be dressed in trousers rather than shorts, usually at around 12 or 13. The fashion was beginning to decline by 1904, but Robin's hair here would not have been intended to indicate anything about gender, nor would it have been read as such at the time. The lack of ornamentation, such as a ribbon (whether tidy or in similarly carefree style to Robin's) would have clearly marked this as the hair of a boychild.
Down with this milquetoast toleration of the intolerant!
Sounds like it was her husband who hoarded the wealth, and that she gave it up once he left it to her.
So though she'd have benefitted greatly from being married to someone so rich, that money wasn't under her control until he died.
Seems her own work was worthwhile to the community.
On the other hand, can be useful to have a moderator in a totally different time zone to the rest of the team.
Lack of history seems more relevant, though not as much as a candidate's personality.
Extra artporn titbit: the British hired artists during the war to design dazzle patterns for ships. Wouldn't be surprising if other countries, such as Canada did too.
Not if their policies increase the rate of reproduction, no, or at least, not for some time, because they know that unwanted & unplanned pregnancies increase the desperation of the women, both in the immediate sense & in slashing the numbers of women who can access education > good employment > sufficient societal security to unionise.
They intend to make it ever harder for anyone, but especially women, to obtain sterilisation or other means of reducing risk of pregnancy. This is why they chase reproductive health in general, even things such as IVF.
You already know these people to be dangerous ideologues - I'd caution against underestimating them or their grotesque vision.
Made the silly mistake of trying to disabuse myself of the fantasy of rewilding a bit of land with some interlaced permaculture, as am barely functional & very clueless, but wanted to avoid group projects as very introverted & would want to camp overnight at times then perhaps graduate to an extra-basic one-person cob structure.
Found something ideal-seeming isn't nearly as costly as I'd imagined, so the fantasies I'd been trying to shed have gone... stratospheric.
Don't really know anyone, so can't even get together a group to buy it as a trust, but may give a collective I'm aware of a head's up as they're likely to know of other collectives who have yet to find suitable land.