Zagaroth

joined 1 year ago
[–] Zagaroth 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue here is that it enables those who would make the actual CP to hide their work easier in the flood of generated content.

Animesque art is one thing, photorealistic is another. Neither actually harms an underaged person by existing, but photorealistic enables actual abusers to hide themselves easily. So IMO, photorealistic 'art' of this sort needs to be criminalized so that it can not be used as a mask for actual CP.

[–] Zagaroth 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Normally I err on the side of 'art' being separated from actual pictures/recordings of abuse. It falls under the "I don't like what you have to say, but I will defend your right to say it" idea.

Photorealistic images of CP? I think that crosses the line, and needs to be treated as if it was actual CP as it essentially enables real CP to proliferate.

[–] Zagaroth 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish I knew what to tell you. I am on Chrome with uBlock Origin, and I don't see YouTube ads. I'm logged into both Chrome and Google/YouTube

[–] Zagaroth 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's a good thing for me that I don't start from the flesh-out story end. I start out with 1+ characters and a scenario. Everything builds from there as I write. I don't know where it's going, so I don't feel as much pressure to get there.

That, and I am writing a Serial over on Royal Road, and have a handful of Patreons. This applies just enough 'expectations' pressure to help push me forward when I would otherwise slack more. :)

[–] Zagaroth 3 points 1 year ago

Doing Okay. I've gotten through my hyperfocus on leveling a new-to-me class in Final Fantasy XIV, so I am able to pull my brain back to writing more. I want to get two more chapters up on my Patreon before my next public chapter is released on Thursday.

[–] Zagaroth 2 points 1 year ago

The views are cumulative across all chapters, so 1k readers x 100 chapters would be 100k views, before getting into things like my editor-in-wife and I revisiting pages as we slowly clean up my early chapters.

But overall, I do feel very good about my story, and most of my other story ideas take place in the same world (if mostly on different continents), so each time I work on any of these ideas, I am fleshing out the world as a whole.

[–] Zagaroth 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the same character's speech (as opposed to switching talkers)? Well, supposedly that's against the rules, but it generally feels better to insert a bit of minor movement anyway :)

[–] Zagaroth 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, for the story itself, it might just be easiest to quote my blurb:

An ancient, dreadfully powerful dungeon core that had once been sealed away to slowly fade into oblivion is revived by a chance encounter, though in a much-reduced state.

A temple monk on her way home for a vacation is distracted into exploring a newly born dungeon due to the cuteness of its rabbit monsters, leading to an entirely unexpected chain of events.

A kitsune whose death caused a goddess to pity her fate and revive her as a reincarnated dungeon.

These three quickly form bonds of necessity and convenience, but then have to navigate a complex relationship and build their own rules to live by.

And for my particular world-building, Living Dungeons have avatars, which is very important to the core story.

I'm writing over on Royal Road (And cross-posting to Ream right now, I may add scribblehub), so each chapter is being published on the website. This is not a direct income maker, the website is free, but Patreon for early chapters is getting me a small monthly amount and there is the possibility of getting a deal with something like Amazon Unlimited (I would prefer to avoid that specific publisher, but we will see what the future holds).

Anyway, I got drawn to RR thanks to a Reddit serial that linked there, and that was my introduction to the Living Dungeon concept. And after a few months of reading various stories on Royal Road, I felt the itch to write my own. :) I had at one point been intending for it to also be a trope-subverting 'harem' story where everyone had good cause to be involved in the relationship and were well-fleshed-out people, but the core relationship stabilized at a triad, and I dropped the harem idea. I would have had to force it in, it no longer fit.

Bonus though: That meant I got to drop the age of one of the future characters, which felt better for her general concept, and that in turn generated the opportunity to touch on another aspect of the world that I hadn't had reason to describe yet. And I get to have another woman get involved in a romance with interesting dynamics, though I am not quite there yet.

And I might as well link it:

https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/57517/no-need-for-a-core

I also have several more ideas waiting in the wings, but I am trying to get my backlog a bit more robust before I divert some of my attention to building those up.

[–] Zagaroth 1 points 1 year ago

Outside of combat, I have very little that needs to be described in that much detail. I do have one specific mechanism in my Living Dungeon story that I felt needed that level of detail, and the description went through a few edits to fine-tune it to communicate the idea accurately but keep the writing clean enough to not be jarring to the reader. I am fortunate enough to be able to get some feedback to help me in that process. I felt that this mechanism needed to be accurate because it is relevant at several points in the story.

The less relevant it is to story beats, the less I am worried about specific details. I have a second mechanism involving large colored, glowing crystals in a ceiling. I described the basic layout and the colors, because they were relevant to events in that room, I did not describe the shape of the crystals, because it doesn't matter.

In combat, how much detail I go into depends on the fight. Less important/low-stakes fights get more of an overview. A duel or spar with setup and some emotional charge? I am getting down to blow-by-blow, especially if I want to show the progression of a character's skill or power, and when getting that detailed I often need to specify which hand a person is using to do what, so that I can line up the action properly.

A right-handed person has a shield in her left hand, and therefore deflects a creature's charge to her left, and is thus spinning left to slash her axe across the back of its leg. I could have described it as her spinning counter-clockwise, which would be more technically accurate but would pull the reader out of the story more to think about. 'spinning left' suffices.

So, I would mostly just try to be sure that it needs to be described in detail.

 

So, the rule is that if you have a single character speaking across multiple paragraphs, you don't use end quotes on those paragraphs. I get the intent of the rule, but I think it looks awful and is jarring.

What I have been doing for a long time, is to insert a minor action at the end of that paragraph or the start of the next. I don't even notice that I am doing it anymore, it just feels natural to have a character gesture or emote in some way every so often.

The only reason that this came to mind is that one of my new readers pointed out a spot in Chapter 50 where I had used end quotes on a paragraph break of continuous speech. I edited in a minor action instead, the character was recalling a previous thought process, so I had him lean back in his chair and look up, which is the sort of thing people often do during that sort of thought.

One of the advantages of publishing a serial online, you potentially get some good feedback. :)

[–] Zagaroth 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nuclear Radiation almost killing people is probably the most problematic, there will be all sorts of long-term damage.

The sci-fi disease at least has the exact properties you want it to have, and the Alien Creature option simply gives you physical damage which comes in your choice of severity. I'd lean toward that over all, but it really depends on what fits the story best.

And might I recommend Royal Road as one of your publishing platforms? Pure fantasy tends to do better than Sci-fi, but at least it is a point of traction. I know a lot of people post across multiple platforms.

[–] Zagaroth 1 points 1 year ago

I have three MCs in my current work. One of them has two bits of art, one of which is the cover art I am using on Royal Road.

https://www.royalroadcdn.com/public/covers-large/57517-no-need-for-a-core.jpg

My other art is on Night Cafe:

https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/KPK3NDl5Jc3N7evZ5b1K/KPK3NDl5Jc3N7evZ5b1K--1--928g5.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max

https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/DEE7CrQ6xXndVy4MZmOq/DEE7CrQ6xXndVy4MZmOq--1--co4mf.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max

https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/k9TMQToJO5PDWpRJGuXi/k9TMQToJO5PDWpRJGuXi--1--qkrza.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max

All of these are AI art, including the cover art (which was done and edited by someone else for me).

I consider these placeholders until such a time as I get properly commissioned art, but that costs money that I do not have.

[–] Zagaroth 16 points 1 year ago

facepalm

Well, we have a horror movie intro right in the article.

Mi first realized that the experiment had been successful when he saw the silkworm’s eyes turning red under the microscope.

 

I've had this happen twice now, though the first time I didn't know what was going on, the second time it happened the change was much more visible.

So, while I am in the middle of writing a reply to Post A, the post is replaced with a different post in the same community. However, the comments remain the comments for Post A, despite the section at the top having been replaced by Post B.

Yes, this means on one page I have the post itself for Post B, and the comments section/replies for Post A

It is very confusing and distracting when this happens.

7
"which" vs "this" (self.writing)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Zagaroth to c/writing
 

So, Grammarly is correcting me a lot on a phrase I tend to use, and I don't entirely understand the difference.

On a sentence that expands upon a previous sentence in dialog, I tend to have a character say "Which means [...]"

Grammarly wants to fix this to be "This means [...]"

It's become clear to me that I tend to use 'which' instead of 'this' when speaking, but I am not sure why one is preferred use over the other.

Can anyone offer me some insight? I already tried googling "which vs this", but I got results for "which vs that" instead, which is an entirely different use case.

view more: next ›