Even people on Arch should use it. It ensures better isolation of processes and is the only supported installation method if you ever have issues.
Ullebe1
Please elaborate.
It uses FCM for the notifications.
Proton uses XWayland, this is for proper, native Wayland support. It will make its way to Proton eventually.
Yup, and I believe it even does it automatically if it fails to reach the desktop for a number of boots in a row.
Depends on which DE in which version it is using, but anything with recent Gnome (Fedora, Ubuntu) will. Not sure if KDE distros generally default to it, and for more niche DEs the answer is probably "no", unless it was explicitly made for Wayland.
Can't Waypipe do this?
Won't most of those pieces of software work on xwayland?
I guess that depends on which power your agenda aligns with. That power is generally a safe choice, compared to services from a power where your agenda is orthogonal.
Seems like a solid bunch of iterative improvements!
I mean most things are implemented as plugins, so you can just disable the ones with features you consider bloat.